A disaster can be defined in many ways based on perspectives, in addition, its types are able to classify differently by various standards. Considering the different perspectives, the disaster can be occurred by natural phenomenon that is like typhoon, earthquake, flood, and drought, and by the accident that is like collapse of facilities, traffic accidents, and environmental pollution, etc. Into the modern society, moreover, the disaster includes the damages by diffusion of epidemic and infectious disease in domestic animals. The disaster was defined by natural and man-made hazards in the past. As societies grew with changes of paradigm, social factors have been included in the concept of the disaster according to new types unexpected by new disease and scientific technology. Change the concept of social disasters, Ministry of Public Safety and Security (MPSS) has provided the regional safety index, which measures the safety level of a local government. However, this regional safety index has some limitation to use because this index provides the information for city unit which is a unit of administrative districts of urban. Since these administrative districts units are on a different level with urban and rural areas, the regional safety index provided by MPSS is not be able to direct apply to the rural areas. The purpose of this study is to determine the regional safety index targeting rural areas. To estimate the safety index, we was used for 3 indicators of the MPSS, a fire, a crime, and an infectious disease which are evaluable the regional safety index using an accessibility analysis. For determining the regional safety index using accessibility from community centers to public facilities, the safety index of fire, crime, and infectious disease used access time to fire station, police office, and medical facility, respectively. An integrated Cheongju, targeting areas in this study, is mixed region with urban and rural areas. The results of regional safety index about urban and rural areas, the safety index in rural area is relatively higher than in the urban. Neverthless the investment would be needed to improve the safety in the rural areas.

I. 서 론
 II. 연구대상지역 및 연구 방법
  1. 연구대상지역
  2. 연구방법
  3. 사용데이터
 III. 마을 단위 안전지수 산정 모델
  1. 화재 안전지수 평가기준
  2. 범죄 안전지수 평가기준
  3. 감염병 안전지수 평가기준
 IV. 결과 및 고찰
  1. 마을단위 접근성 평가
  2. 마을단위 안전지수 평가
  3. 읍면 단위 지역 안전지수
  3. 시군구 단위 지역 안전지수
 V. 결 론
 References

• 전정배(충북대학교 농업생명환경대학 지역건설공학과) | Jeon Jeongbae
• 김솔희(서울대학교 농업생명과학대학 생태조경·지역시스템공학부) | Kim Solhee
• 서교(서울대학교 국제농업기술대학원, 서울대학교 그린바이오과학기술연구원) | Suh Kyo
• 윤성수(충북대학교 농업생명환경대학 지역건설공학과) | Yoon Seongsoo Corresponding author