논문 상세보기

釋迦塔과 多寶塔의 명칭적인 타당성 검토 KCI 등재

A Review on Nominal Validity of Seokgatab and Dabotab

  • 언어KOR
  • URLhttps://db.koreascholar.com/Article/Detail/424679
구독 기관 인증 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다. 5,500원
건축역사연구 (Journal of Architectural History)
한국건축역사학회 (Korean Association of Architectural History)
초록

The names of Seokgatab and Dabotab are almost generalized among the people along with Bulguksa the most well-known temple in Korea. But, despite this generalized situation, the names of Seokgatab and Dabotab have not secured the clear standpoint till now. It is because the names of Seokgatab and Dabotab can be found only in the 18C documents like <Bulguksa History> and <Ancient and Present Bulguksa>. More complicatedly, in the record of the Goryeo sarira case found during the dismantling of Seokgatab, the name of Seokgatab was 'Mugujeonggwangtab' or 'Seoseoktab'. This paper is to secure the nominal validity of Seokgatab and Dabotab to remove the confusion due to their names and to raise the efficiency of studies related with Bulguksa in the future. First, their names and the problems related with them were summarized in Chapter 2. Based on this critical consciousness, Chapter 3 deals with the tragedy of Asadal related with the creation of the stone pagodas and its symbolic re-interpretation. In this process, we can see that there could be a viewpoint of the great comprehension in them through the completion of 'the Buddhist Nation'. Then, the architectural features of Seokgatab and Dabotab were analyzed in the ritual view point of <Gyeonbotabpum>. Finally, in Chapter 4, on the basis that the viewpoint of one specific sect can not be predominantly applied in the construction of Buddhist land, it is held that Avatamsaka Idea and Saddharma-puṇḍarīka Idea can coexist without any conflict. It is shown in the fact that Seokgatab and Dabotab can make harmony together in the Avatamsaka Idea while keeping their names. With these efforts, we can clearly see that the peculiar titles of Seokgatab and Dabotab can be said to secure sufficient validity.

목차
1. 서론
2. 명칭과 관련된 문제점
3. 아사달 설화와 형태적인 타당성
    3-1. 아사달 설화의 상징성과 다보탑
    3-2. 다보탑과 석가탑의 형태적인특징과 「見寶塔品」
4. 불국사 가람배치와 사상배경적인 타당성
    4-1. 화엄사상과 석가·다보 쌍탑
    4-2. 화엄과 법화의 이중구조와 석가·다보 쌍탑
5. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
저자
  • 염중섭(동국대학교 철학과 강사) | Youm Jung-Seop (Department of Philosophy an instructor, Dongguk University) Corresponding author