of hazardous risk factors, risk estimation and determination steps by reflecting the trend of overseas risk assessment. METHODS : In deriving, estimating and determining risk factors, comparing the procedures presented by the ILO with the domestic guidline to find out the differences in procedural. and, According to the domestic manual, after setting the criteria for determining a deterministic perspective, analyze the risk assessment data of a specific domestic company and three overseas risk assessment research data to analyze the differences in methodology domestic and abroad. RESULTS : Within the country, there is a possibility that a deterministic view may be applied to all stages of procedure, and certain corporate data to the risk estimation and determination stage. In the case of overseas, the trend of applying deterministic perspectives to the risk determination stage was confirmed. CONCLUSIONS : Present the need for a standard model for improving deterministic methods in the other two stages, excluding risk determination in the domestic evaluation procedure.

1. 서론
2. 연구절차
    2.1. 국내 평가해설서와 해외 평가절차서 비교분석
    2.2. 판단기준 설정 및 국내 위험성평가 사례 분석
    2.3. 해외 위험성평가 연구자료 분석
    2.4. 표준모델 개선을 위한 필요성 제시
3. 본론
    3.1. 국내 평가해설서 및 해외 평가절차서 비교분석
    3.2. 판단기준 설정 및 국내 위험성평가 사례 분석
    3.3. 해외 위험성평가 연구자료 분석
4. 분석결과
    4.1. 결론
    4.2. 향후 연구방안

• 이산(서울시립대학교 재난과학과 박사 과정) | Lee San
• 함승희(정회원 · 서울시립대학교 소방방재학과 교수) | Ham Seung Hee
• 이준(정회원 · 한국교통연구원 교통안전·방재연구센터 연구위원) | Lee Jun (Research Fellow Department Road Transport, Center for National Transport Safety and Prevention, 30147 Shcheong-daero, Sejoing City, Korea) 교신저자