논문 상세보기

Sociocultural meanings of flapper look - Analyzed from The New York Times articles - KCI 등재

플래퍼 룩의 사회 문화적 의미 고찰 - The New York Times 기사를 중심으로 -

  • 언어KOR
  • URLhttps://db.koreascholar.com/Article/Detail/344211
구독 기관 인증 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다. 4,200원
복식문화연구 (The Research Journal of the Costume Culture)
복식문화학회 (The Costume Culture Association)
초록

The purpose of this study is to examine the sociocultural meanings of flapper look in American society during the 1920s. Using the ProQuest database, I searched articles from The New York Times published between 1920 and 1929 for opinions and discussions on the flapper look. Keywords included “clothing,” “dress,” “fashion,” and “flapper,” and advertisements and articles on menswear, leisurewear, and bathing suits were excluded. In the resulting articles, I extracted the following sociocultural meanings: autonomy, activeness, practicality, attractiveness, and extravagance. Meanings were analyzed from the opinions and discussions focusing on skirt length, dresses that directly and indirectly exposed the body, heavy make-up, non-constricting underwear, the H-line dress, bobbed hair, hygiene, comfort, and consumption. In sum, the 1920s flapper look represented progressive characteristics such as autonomous and active womanhood and practicality, which matched the technological development of the time. However, the flapper look was commercialized and exploited to make women look attractive and extravagant. Even though American women had access to higher education, more economic power, and suffrage in the 1920s, they were limited in their ability to overcome social conventions and the power of consumerism. Understanding the double-sidedness of flapper look within the social context of the time would enhance the comprehension of the relationship between women’s lifestyles and changing fashion.

목차
Abstract
 I. Introduction
 Ⅱ. Background
  1. American women in the 1920s
  2. Flapper look
 Ⅲ. Research Method
 Ⅳ. Sociocultural Meanings ofFlapper Look
  1. Autonomy
  2. Activeness
  3. Practicality
  4. Attractiveness
 Ⅴ. Conclusion
 References
저자
  • Yhe Young Lee(Dept. of Home Economics Education, Korea University) | 이예영 Corresponding author