In this study, a correlation between execution of quality management activities and their results was verified by applying the Malcolm Baldrige model (hereafter referred to as the MB model) as a quality management performance measurement indicator for small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in South Korea. To achieve this goal, we need to determine whether the categorical requirements in the MB model are recognized consistently in SMEs, as a prerequisite. To this end, factor analysis was conducted for measurement variables in each category, which revealed that the process indicator was made up of six factors and the outcome indicator was made up of five factors, like those configured in the MB model. This result can be interpreted to mean that the requirements in each category of the MB model were well produced and recognized consistently throughout SMEs in South Korea. In addition, the analysis of causality between the process indicator (quality management activities) and the outcome indicator (management results) showed high causality between them. Although the quality management levels of SMEs in South Korea are inferior to those of conglomerates or other national quality award-winning companies, this study is significant in that the causality between quality management activities and results was verified, since this study targeted SMEs in South Korea as the target of investigation. Thus, it is empirically proven that the MB model can contribute to improved management results for SMEs in Korea.

1. Introduction
 2. Theoretical Discussion
  2.1 Core Quality Management Activities
  2.2 Quality Management Performance Measurement
  2.3 MB Model
  2.4 Need for Quality Management Activities in SMEs
  2.5 Previous Studies on Quality Managementand Management Performance
 3. Study Method
  3.1 Definition of Measurement Variables
  3.2 Data Collection and Analysis
 4. Empirical Analysis
  4.1 Analysis of Reliability and Validity
  4.2 Causality of the Process Indicator (qualityManagement Activities) and OutcomeIndicator (results)
 5. Conclusion
 References

• 정수일(School of I. E, Kumoh Nat’l Institute of Technology) | S. I. Jung
• 권정훈(School of I. E, Kumoh Nat’l Institute of Technology) | J. H. Kwon
• 오현승(Dept. of IME, Hannam University) | H. S. Oh
• 이세재(School of I. E, Kumoh Nat’l Institute of Technology) | S. J. Lee
• 조진형(School of I. E, Kumoh Nat’l Institute of Technology) | J. H. Cho Corresponding Author