논문 상세보기

2015년도 형법판례 회고 KCI 등재

The Reviews of the Criminal Cases of the Korean Supreme Court and Korean Constitutional Court in 2015

  • 언어KOR
  • URLhttps://db.koreascholar.com/Article/Detail/351164
서비스가 종료되어 열람이 제한될 수 있습니다.
刑事判例硏究 (형사판례연구)
한국형사판례연구회 (Korean Association of Criminal Case Studies)
초록

In the year of 2015, 219 criminal cases by the Korean Supreme Court(KSC) are registered on the internet homepage of the Court. 3 criminal law cases of which are decided by the Grand Panel. In this paper, these three cases and several cases are reviewed which seem to be comparatively important. In addition, are reviewed some cases by Korean Constitutional Court which review the constitutionality of some criminal provisions such as violence with weapon or dangerous thing. All the reviews are constituted as follows : 1. The Fact of the Case, 2. The Summary of Decision and 3. The Note. The contents of this paper is as follows; I. Introduction II. The Judgements of the Grand Panel of the Korean Supreme Court In this chapter, 3 cases of the Grand Panel of the KSC are reviewed. III. The Decisions of the Korean Constitutional Court In this chapter, 3 cases on the constitutionality of the criminal provisions are reviewed. The subject of the cases are the violence crime with a weapon or a dangerous thing, sex offender registration and the medicine treatment of sex offenders. IV. Several Judgements of The Korean Supreme Court In this chapter, 3 cases are reviewed. The subjects of the cases are such as the breach of trust, the concept of the drug, the concept of the public service man and etc.

목차
I. 머리말
 Ⅱ. 전원합의체 판결
  I. 살인의 고의 및 수난구호법 제18조 제1항 단서의 적용범위
   1. 사실관계
   2. 판결요지
   3. 평 가
    (1) 살인의 고의
    (2) 수난구조법 제18조 제1항의 적용범위
  Ⅱ. 지입차량 횡령죄의 주체
   1. 사실관계 및 재판의 경과
   2. 판결요지
   3. 평석
    (1) 대상판결의 의의
    (2) 평 가
  Ⅲ. 내란선동죄 및 음모죄의 성립요건
   1. 내란선동죄
    (1) 사실관계
    (2) 판결요지
    (3) 평 석
     1) 선동죄와 교사죄의 비교
     2) 선동죄의 성립요건
   2. 내란음모죄
    (1) 사실관계
    (2) 판결요지
    (3) 평석
     1) 음모죄의 성립요건
     2) 평가
 Ⅲ. 헌법재판소 결정
  1. 사실관계 및 재판의 경과
  2. 결정요지
  3. 평석
   (1) 대상결정의 입장
   (2) 평 가
    1) ‘휴대하여’의 문제점
 Ⅱ. 신상정보등록의 헌법불합치성
  1. 사실관계
  2. 결정요지
  3. 평석
 Ⅲ. 성충동약물치료의 헌법불합치성
  1. 사실관계 및 재판의 경과
  2. 결정요지
  3. 평가
 Ⅳ. 대법원 판례
  I. 담보로 제공한 임차권의 양도와 배임죄의 성립여부– 대법원
   1. 사실관계
   2. 판결요지
   3. 평석
  Ⅱ. 마약류 매매죄의 객체
   1. 사실관계 및 재판의 경과
   2. 판결요지
   3. 평 석
  Ⅲ. 공무집행방해죄에서 공무원의 범위
   1. 사실관계
   2. 판결요지
   3. 평 석
   [Abstract]
저자
  • 오영근(한양대학교 법학전문대학원 교수, Prof. Dr.. School of Law, Hanyang University.) | OH, Young Keun