한국환경과학회지 제29권 제3호 (p.307-318)

|TECHNICAL NOTE|
비료제조업의 국내와 EU 최적가용기법 기준서 비교·분석

Comparative Analysis of Best Available Techniques Reference Documents on the Fertilizer Manufacture between Korea and European Union
키워드 :
Water quality,Air pollution,BAT,K-BREF,EU-BREF,Fertilizer

목차

Abstract
1. 서 론
2. 재료 및 방법
   2.1. 비교분석 및 방법
3. 결과 및 고찰
   3.1. 산업분류와 구성
   3.2. BAT (best available techniques referencedocument)
   3.3. 오염물질 배출특성
   3.4. 최적가용기법 연계배출수준
4. 결 론
REFERENCES

초록

The integrated permit system is applied to class 1 and 2 atmospheric and water pollutant discharge facilities in 19 sectors. The fertilizer sector should receive a permit for a period of four years, from 2019 to 2023. The purpose of this study is to investigate the differences between the Korean Best Available Techniques (BAT) reference document (K-BREF) and the European Union BAT reference document (EU-BREF) in terms of the process and emission characteristics of fertilizer manufacture. K-BREF is written by focusing on products, whereas EU-BREF is produced on focusing on manufacture process. There are five types of BATs(best available techniques economically achievable) in Korea. These BATs selected mainly to recover and reuse raw meterials and save energy. The number of BATs and BAT-AELs(BAT associated emission level) in K-BREF is smaller than that in EU-BREF. We suggest that BATs and those environmental management parameters in Korea need to further reflect the emission characteristics in the fertilizer sector.