논문 상세보기

M5 등급 낮은조명 개발 및 기존 등주식 조명과 시지각적 성능 비교 KCI 등재

Development of M5 Low-Level Lighting and Visual Performance Comparison with Typical Pole Lighting

  • 언어KOR
  • URLhttps://db.koreascholar.com/Article/Detail/405354
구독 기관 인증 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다. 4,000원
한국도로학회논문집 (International journal of highway engineering)
한국도로학회 (Korean Society of Road Engineers)
초록

PURPOSES : The purpose of this study is to introduce the development of M5 low-level lighting (LLL) with the necessity and justification, mainly the ecological traffic safety merits and the convenience and traffic efficiency of maintenance compared to the existing high mounted pole lightings. The basic photometric property of the developed facility is analyzed. The visual performance is analyzed in terms of visibility distance and subjective opinions from the subjects on several factors related to lighting performance.
METHODS : The basic photometric properties of LLL were measured in a tunnel-shaped shield with a visibility meter (LMK 5 Color). The visibility distance between LLL and existing pole-based lighting was observed by 13 subjects under various weather conditions, such as dry, rainy, and wet conditions. In addition, the subjective opinions in terms of several pre-designed factors regarding lighting performance were surveyed.
RESULTS : The developed M5 LLL satisfied photometric requirements such as average surface luminance, overall uniformity, and lane uniformity, as suggested by the lighting guidelines. More than 200 m of visibility distances were measured under normal weather conditions for both LLL and existing pole lightings. However, more than 200 m were observed under a wet surface and a rain intensity of 20 mm/h in the case of LLL, but visibility distance was reduced to 48.46 m in the case of pole lightings. A higher visibility distance was observed in the case of amber colored LLL. According to the results of the subjective opinion survey, all types of lightings had favored ratings, and the whitecolored LLL showed the highest ratings under normal weather conditions. However, existing pole lightings had unfavorable ratings under wet surface and rainy conditions, whereas the amber colored LLL had favorable ratings compared to pole lightings in terms of uniformity of illumination, glare, and psychological stability.
CONCLUSIONS : The necessity of M5 LLL lies on the cost-effective application to the low standard roadways where the cost is always the main factor to consider in safety facilities and the ecological benefits of roadsides. The developed LLL satisfied the basic optical property suggested by the related lighting guidelines and showed higher performance in terms of visibility distance across various weather conditions compared to the existing high mounted pole lightings.

목차
ABSTRACT
1. 서론
2. 도로조명 기준 검토
    2.1. 「도로안전시설 설치 및 관리지침-조명시설편」(국토교통부, 2019)
    2.2. KS A 3701 도로조명기준(산업통상자원부, 2019)
3. 최소 성능 낮은조명 개발
4. 최소 성능 낮은조명 광학 성능 평가
    4.1. 실험환경 및 최소 성능 낮은조명 설치
    4.2. 측정 장비
    4.3. 측정 방법
    4.4. 측정 결과
5. 조명방식별 시인 성능 비교실험
    5.1. 실험 목적
    5.2. 피실험자 및 장애물
    5.3. 시인거리 평가 시나리오
    5.4. 시인거리 평가 결과
    5.5. 낮은조명의 이미지 설문평가
6. 결론
REFERENCES
저자
  • 진민수(한국건설기술연구원 미래융합연구본부/서울시립대학교 교통공학과) | Jin Minsoo
  • 정준화(한국건설기술연구원 미래융합연구본부) | Jeong Junhwa 교신저자