In Korea, Kori Unit 1 and Wolsong Unit 1, have been permanently shut down in 2017 and 2019, and more nuclear power plants are expected to be permanently shut down after continued operation successively. Spent fuel has been generated during operation and stored in spent fuel pools. Due to the expected saturation of spent fuel pools within the next several decades, transportation of a huge amount of spent fuel is anticipated to interim storage facilities or final disposal facilities, even though the specific location is not decided. The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) states that every environmental report prepared for the licensing stage of a Pressurized Water Reactor shall contain a statement concerning risk during the transportation of fuel and radioactive wastes to and from the reactor. Thus, the licensee should ensure that the radiological effects in accidents, as well as normal conditions in transport, do not exceed certain criteria or be small if cannot be numerically quantified. Specific conditions that a full description and detailed analysis of the environmental effects of transportation of fuel and wastes to and from the reactor are exempted are specified in 10 CFR Part 51. Since there are no official requirements for radiological dose assessment for workers and public during the transportation of spent fuel in Korea, the margin when applying the U.S. regulatory criteria to the environmental impact assessment during the transport of spent fuel generated from domestic nuclear power plants is evaluated. A different approach would be needed due to the difference in the characteristics of spent fuel and geographical features.

The amount of waste that contains or is contaminated with radionuclides is increasing gradually due to the use of radioactive material in various fields including the operation and decommissioning of nuclear facilities. Such radioactive waste should be safely managed until its disposal to protect public health and the environment. Predisposal management of radioactive waste covers all the steps in the management of radioactive waste from its generation up to disposal, including processing (pretreatment, treatment, and conditioning), storage, and transport. There could be a lot of strategies for the predisposal management of radioactive waste. In order to comply with safety requirements including Waste Acceptance Criteria (WAC) at the radioactive waste repository however, the optimal scenario must be derived. The type and form of waste, the radiation dose of workers and the public, the technical options, and the costs would be taken into account to determine the optimal one. The time required for each process affects the radiation dose and respective cost as well as those for the following procedures. In particular, the time of storing radioactive waste would have the highest impact because of the longest period which decreases the concentrations of radionuclides but increases the cost. There have been little studies reported on optimization reflecting variations of radiation dose and cost in predisposal management scenarios for radioactive waste. In this study, the optimal storage time of radioactive waste was estimated for several scenarios. In terms of the radiation dose, the cumulative collective dose was used as the parameter for each process. The cost was calculated considering the inflation rate and interest rate. Since the radiation dose and the cost should be interconvertible for optimization, the collective dose was converted into monetary value using the value so-called “alpha value” or “monetary value of Person-Sv”.

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) states that every environmental report prepared for the licensing stage of a Pressurized Water Reactor shall contain a statement concerning risk during the transportation of fuel and radioactive wastes to and from the reactor. Thus, the licensee should ensure that the radiological effect in accidents, as well as normal conditions in transport, do not exceed certain criteria or be small if cannot be numerically quantified. These are specified in 10 CFR Part 51 and applied in NUREG-1555 Supplement 1 Revision 1, which deals with Environmental Standard Review Plan. Corresponding regulations in Korea would be the Nuclear Safety and Security Commission Notice No. 2020-7. In Appendix 2 of the Notice, guides on the radiological environmental report for production and utilization facilities, spent nuclear fuel interim storage facilities, and radioactive waste disposal facilities. In this guide, unlike the regulations in the U.S., there are no obligations for radiological dose assessment for workers and public during the transportation. Therefore, overall regulations and their legal basis related to risk assessment during transportation conducted for the environmental report in the U.S. were analyzed in this study. On top of that, through the comparison with regulations in Korea, differences between the two systems were figured out. Finally, this study aims to find the points in terms of assessing transport risk to be revised in the current regulatory system in Korea.