We developed the logical methods to analyze economic impacts of standardization and cleared up effects of performing KS in micro and macro aspects. This study is performed through analysing foreign studies and results from surveys. The advanced methods pe
As a result of globalization process and TBT agreement, KS is also being revised, reestablished and some are abolished according to international standards such as ISO, IEC, etc. Conventional KS sampling inspection standards contained many different proce
Korean Standard Certificate, suitable for the korean industrial standards is one which was designed not only to spread and utilize the industrial standard established for the industrial standardization, but to protect the consumer. In this study, the practical effects of the Korean Standard Certificate will be examined in various fields, based on the small medium enterprises which achieved the KS Certificate. In order to look into how the system has effects on the performance of the management in a company, the method of the actual approach will be used. In the end, the purpose of this study is to find the plan in which KS Certificate can be helpful to the development of the company.
The growing importance of product quality is becoming more and more daily apparent as we enter the age of globalization around the world. And the product safety is getting more focus as well as product quality. As a result, many domestic companies are putting a lot of emphasis on safety measures and management activities and these companies' products are mainly superior to other companies' product. When we separate the product quality procedure into 3 steps, i.e. quality secure-quality confirm-quality guarantee, of course the 1st step is the most important, but also End step of product quality confirm process is important. And in mass production environment, sampling inspection is more desirable than the 100 % inspection procedure. As a part of globalization trend, KS system is also being revised and reestablished based on ISO, IEC, etc. which are based on international standard. Conventional KS sampling inspection standards were in many areas quite different from ISO sampling standards, only KS A 3102, 3104, 3151 are left and the rest become obsolete, and even the ones that are still around are planned to the gone step by step. It has been already 3 years since the new KS A ISO 2859-0-3 sampling inspection process has been established which the abolition of the popular KS A 3101, KS A 3105, KS A 3109, yet the implementation rate is very slow. This study will attempt to analyze the new KS A ISO 2859-2 and KS A ISO 2859-3, and try to understand the difference as that the new standard can be easily understood and used widely among companies, by using examples. Our attempt is to help implement with the companies with active safety involvement but the final result can be spread among other companies as well in the near future.
The growing importance of product quality is becoming more and more daily apparent as we enter the age of globalization around the world. And the product safety is getting more focus as well as product quality. As a result, many domestic companies are putting a lot of emphasis on safety measures and management activities and these companies' products are mainly superior to other companies' product. When we separate the product quality procedure into 3 steps, i.e. quality secure-quality confirm-quality guarantee, of course the 1st step is the most important, but also 2nd step of product quality confirm process is important. And in mass production environment, sampling inspection is more desirable than the 100% inspection procedure. As a part of globalization trend, KS system is also being revised and reestablished based on ISO, IEC, etc. which are based on international standard. Conventional KS sampling inspection standards were in many areas quite different from ISO sampling standards, only KS A 3102, 3104, 3151 are left and the rest become obsolete, and even the ones that are still around are planned to the gone step by step. It has been already 3 years since the new KS A ISO 2859-0~3 sampling inspection process has been established which the abolition of the popular KS A 3101, KS A 3105, KS A 3109, yet the implementation rate is very slow. This study will attempt to analyze the new KS A ISO 2859-2 and KS A ISO 2859-3, and try to understand the difference as that the new standard can be easily understood and used widely among companies, by using examples. Our attempt is to help implement with the companies with active safety involvement but the final result can be spread among other companies as well in the near future.
As a result of globalization process and TBT agreement, KS is also being revised, reestablished and some are abolished according to international standards such as ISO, IEC, etc. Conventional KS sampling inspection standards contained many different procedures from ISO, but recently, to match with international standards, all the rest of the standards except KS A 3102, 3104, 3151 were abolished, and the even the ones being in use still are also scheduled and be revised. Especially, KS A 3101, KS A 3105, KS A 3109, which were used most frequently in Korea were abolished, and the KS A ISO 2859-0~3 which coincide with ISO standards were established 3 years ago, but the implementation rate is very slow. Starting next year the national examination for qualification process for the product quality related item will the started and the preparation is underway. This study will investigate the recent sampling inspection process of KS as well as SPC related KS overhaul problem and present the data to help workers in SPC related field. One of the main example will be on KS A ISO 2859-3 and will attempt to help those medium and small sized companies with examples.
우리나라에서는 일찍이 정부에 의해 품질관리(Quality Control)가 적극 추진되어져 범산업적으로 전개되어지고 있으며 선진각국의 ISO-9000 품질보증체제를 국내 KS 규격에 맞추어 국내 품질심사분야에의 본제도의 도입을 시행하여 생산현장의 근로자들 위주로 추진되어온 품질관리제도가 최고 경영진들을 비롯한 모든 종업원들이 참여하는 품질경영(Quality Management)체제로 바뀌어야만 하고 실정에 따라 정부에서도 선진회된 품질경영표준규격(ISO9000 시리즈, 국제표준화기구: 국제 무역 및 기술교류의 촉징을 목적으로 국제 규격을 제정 보급하도록 설립된 국제기구)을 도입하고 이를 전 산업에 확산․발전시키고자 ISO 9000시리즈를 한국의 산업 규격(KS9000)으로 채택하고 이 규격에 의한 품질 보증 시스템 인증 제도를 실시하고자 많은 노력을 기울였다. 그러나 2001년 새로은 ISO 규격이 국내 KS규격에 적용됨에 따라 약 2년이상의 시간이 지나도 국내 제조산업에서의 적용이 미비하다고 생각되는바 새로운 규격의 제조 현장의 도입의 시급함을 느끼며 광대한 KS규격 가운데 통계적 품질관리에서 사용되는 검정과 추정, 관리도, 샘플링, 실험게획법에 대하여 살펴보기로 한다.
We developed the logical methods to analyze economic impacts of standardization and applied these analytical ways into performing this studies in micro and macro aspects. This study is performed through analysing foreign studies and results from surveys. The advanced methods performing standardization as a form of "korean standards" are suggested here. which are based on results of this study. The major consequences of this study are followings. The economic micro impact is that each company gets 604.5 millions won a year through performing KS A, F(discount rate 4.5%) and 1.46 trillions won is the macro economic impact through performing total KS A, F, which comes to 0.245% of GDP.
The purposes of this study are to investigate the conformity of Korean Standards(KS) according to agreement on WTO/TBT, and to propose systematic frameworks of preparation, adoption, and application for KS in our enterprises. Significant changes in this e
The purposes of this study are to investigate the conformity of Korean Standards(KS) according to agreement on WTO/TBT, and to propose systematic frameworks of preparation, adoption, and application for KS in our enterprises. Significant changes in this establishment, revision, and abrogation include the following divisions; ⅰ) statistics-vocabulary and symbols, ⅱ) Shewhart control chart, ⅲ) statistical interpretation of data, ⅳ) sampling procedures for inspection by attributes, ⅴ) sequential sampling plans for inspection.
철근콘크리트 구조물의 설계 시 구조물의 연성거동을 보장할 수 있도록 한다. 연성거동에 영향을 미치는 주요 인자 중 하나는 철근이다. 철근콘크리트에 사용되는 철근은 KS D 3504에 따라 제작되어지는데, 설계 시 사용되는 철근의 항 복강도는 KS D 3504에서 제시하는 기준 항복강도이다. 항복강도가 달라짐에 따라 구조물의 파괴거동 또한 달라질 수 있다. 본 연구에서는 기준 항복강도와 KS D 3504에서 허용하고 있는 허용 최대항복강도를 적용하였을 때의 구조물의 파괴거동 차이를 비교 및 분석하였다.