본 논문는 개폐식 대공간 구조물의 지진하중에 대한 동적응답을 줄이기 위한 목적으로 파라메트릭 설계 기법을 적용한 TMD에 관한 연구이다. 인공지능 알고리즘을 이용하여 감쇠장치의 설치 위치를 자동 탐색하는 컴포넌트를 개발하였다. 이는 구조물의 동적응답을 실시간으로 확인하고, 구조물의 감쇠장치 최적의 위치를 찾을 수 있을 있다. 또한, 여러 대안에 대한 감쇠장치 질량의 최적 값을 찾아주며, 지붕의 열린 상태와 닫힌 상태에 모두 효과적으로 적용될 수 있는 설계안을 찾을 수 있다.

본 연구의 목적은 개폐식 대공간 구조물의 풍하중 산정 및 구조해석의 과정을 자동으로 수행하는 컴포넌트를 개발하는 것이다. 설계한 파라메트릭 모델링을 StrAuto를 통해 구조해석 자동화단계를 거쳐 구조해석용 모델로 변환하는 과정을 실시간 으로 연동하여 구조해석 결과를 자동으로 도출하는 과정으로부터 본 연구에서는 추가로 구조물의 풍하중을 형상에 따라 상세히 할당하는 기능을 개발하였다. 이와 같은 과정을 통해 풍하중에 대한 최적화를 수행하여, 기존 설계된 구조의 물량을 줄이고, 구조적 안정성은 유지하는 방향으로 결론을 도출하였다. 추후에는 본 예제 모델을 통해 진동제어 최적화를 위한 제진 장치 설치위치의 자동탐색이 가능하게 되는 연구를 진행할 계획이다.

In this study, the retractable-roof spatial structure was chosen as the analytical model and a tuned mass damper (TMD) was installed in the analytical model in order to control the seismic response. The analysis model is mainly consisted of runway trusses (RT) and transverse trusses (TT), and the displacement response was analyzed by installing TMD on those trusses. The mass of the single TMD which is installed in the analytical model was set to 1% of the total structure mass and the total TMD mass ratio was set to be 8% or 6%. In addition, the mass of a single TMD was varied depending on the number of installations. As a result of analyzing the optimal number of installations of TMD, the displacement response was reduced in all cases compared to the case without TMD. Above all, the case with 8 TMDs was the most effective in reducing he displacement response. However, in this case, as the load on the upper structure of the retractable-roof spatial structure increases, the total mass ratio of TMD was maintained and the number of TMDs was increased to reduce the mass ratio of one TMD.

In the precedent study, the retractable-roof spatial structure was selected as the analytical model and a tuned mass damper (TMD) was installed to control the dynamic response for the earthquake loads. Also, it is analyzed that the installation location of TMD in the analytical model and the optimal number of installations. A single TMD mass installed in the analytical model was set up 1% of the mass of the whole structure, and the optimum installation location was derived according to the number of change. As a result, it was verified that most effective to install eight TMDs regardless of opening or closing. Thus, in this study, eight TMDs were installed in the retractable-roof spatial structure and the optimum mass ratio was inquired while reducing a single TMD. In addition, the optimum mass distribution ratio was identified by redistributing the TMD masses differently depending on the installation position, using the mass ratio of vibration control being the most effective for seismic load. From the analysis results, as it is possible to confirm the optimum mass distribution ratio according to the optimum mass ratio and installation location of the TMD in the the retractable-roof spatial structure, it can be used as a reference in the TMD design for large space structure.

In this study, TMD(Tuned Mass Damper) is installed in a retractable-roof spatial structure in order to investigate dynamic response characteristics according to mass ratio and installed position of TMD on large spatial structures. The example analytical model is generated based on the Singapore sports hub stadium. Twenty eight analytical models are used to investigate optimal installation position of TMD for the example retractable-roof spatial structure using 4 to 16 TMDs. The mass of one TMD is set up 1% of total mass at the example analytical model. Displacement response ratio of model with TMD is compared with that of base model without TMD. It has been found from numerical simulation that it is more effective to install TMD at the edge of the spatial structure rather than to concentrate the TMD at the center of the spatial structure.

In this paper, a structural design method of a smart tuned mass damper (TMD) for a retractable-roof spatial structure under earthquake excitation was proposed. For this purpose, a retractable-roof spatial structure was simplified to a single degree of freedom (SDOF) model. Dynamic characteristics of a retractable-roof spatial structure is changed based on opened or closed roof condition. This condition was considered in the numerical simulation. A magnetorheological (MR) damper was used to compose a smart TMD and a displacement based ground-hook control algorithm was used to control the smart TMD. The control effectiveness of a smart TMD under harmonic and earthquake excitation were evaluated in comparison with a conventional passive TMD. The vibration control robustness of a smart TMD and a passive TMD were compared along with the variation of natural period of a simplified structure. Dynamic responses of a smart TMD and passive TMD under resonant harmonic excitation and earthquake load were compared by varying mass ratio of TMD to total mass of the simplified structure. The design procedure proposed in this study is expected to be used for preliminary design of a smart TMD for a retractable-roof spatial structure.

A retractable-roof spatial structure is frequently used for a stadium and sports hall. A retractable-roof spatial structure allows natural lighting, ventilation, optimal conditions for grass growth with opened roof. It can also protects users against various weather conditions and give optimal circumstances for different activities. Dynamic characteristics of a retractable-roof spatial structure is changed based on opened or closed roof condition. A tuned mass damper (TMD) is widely used to reduce seismic responses of a structure. When a TMD is properly tuned, its control performance is excellent. Opened or closed roof condition causes dynamic characteristics variation of a retractable-roof spatial structure resulting in off-tuning. This dynamic characteristics variation was investigated. Control performance of a passive TMD and a smart TMD were evaluated under off-tuning condition.

From the past, space structure have been widely used as sports arenas, religious facilities. And the demand and research for retractable structure is increasing recently. Therefore, we classify the retractable mechanism which is divided according to the retractable method of structures and survey the present condition of retractable structures built around the world.