검색결과

검색조건
좁혀보기
검색필터
결과 내 재검색

간행물

    분야

      발행연도

      -

        검색결과 6

        1.
        2020.03 KCI 등재 구독 인증기관 무료, 개인회원 유료
        Many countries around the world are pursuing various support policies to foster start-ups national widely in order to secure new economic growth engines in the era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. The South Korean government announced the diffusion strategy for the 2’nd round Start-up Boom in March 2019 and is promoting the support policies for start-up incubating by various programs. Many incubators and startup accelerators operate various kinds of programs to foster start-ups using government financial supports. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of entrepreneurship and technical capability of entrepreneurs as the internal factors of the technology-based start-ups and the effects of programs supported by the government as an external factor on the corporate performance of a start-up company, and the mediating effects of core competence of start-ups were analyzed using SPSS and AMOS. The results show that the entrepreneurship, technical capability and the programs supported by incubators or accelerators had no direct effects on the corporate performance of a start-up, but the core competence of the company had complete mediating effects. In addition, the type of program supported by the comprehensive accelerator programs or the marketing supports had effects on the core competence rather than simple financial supports. Lastly, the policy proposals for incubating program support and future research directions along with the limitation are suggested.
        4,200원
        2.
        2017.02 KCI 등재 구독 인증기관 무료, 개인회원 유료
        본 연구는 벤처창업기업의 대표자 기술혁신역량과 경영진의 전문화, 기술사업 투 자계획의 타당성 등이 기업의 경영성과인 재무건전도와 나아가 부실화가능성에 미치는 영향에 대하여 구조방정식 모델(SEM)을 이용한 실증분석을 실시하였다. 본 연구는 2011년∼2012년 2 년 동안 1,419개 표본기업에 대한 기술보증기금 기술평가 전문가들의 현장평가 데이터와 기업 현황 조사정보 및 재무정보 등을 활용하였으며, 설립후 7년이내 기술력 기반의 벤처기업들 속성 상 ‘고위험⋅고수익’으로써 여타기업보다 부실화가능성이 높은 기업군인 점을 감안하여 이들 기 업을 연구대상으로 설정하였다. 분석 결과, 대표자의 풍부한 경험과 기술지식 등 기술혁신역량 과 경영진의 분야별 전문화를 바탕으로 한 체계적 조직운영, 그리고 적정규모의 기술사업 투자 ⋅재무관리 계획수립 및 합리적 추진 등을 통하여 기업의 성장성과 수익성 등 기업의 전반적인 재무건전도를 향상시키고, 나아가 단기적 부실화리스크도 감축시키는 것으로 확인되었다.
        5,600원
        3.
        2015.12 KCI 등재 구독 인증기관 무료, 개인회원 유료
        This study analyzes the business performance of research and development(R&D) and especially studies the effect of technology management activity and technology innovation competency on commercialization performance. According to previous studies, the technology management activity can be composed of technological innovativeness, analysis of market, R&D method, and appropriateness for commercialization plan. Also, the technology innovation can be divided into patent, R&D manpower, R&D investment ratio, production capability, and marketing capability. On the result of the analysis, all the components of technology management activity are positively related with commercialization performance. In case of technology innovation competency, however, only production and marketing capabilities have influence on the business performance. Especially, marketing capability controls the effect of technology management activities on the commercialization performance. Consequently, technology management is very important activity for SMEs to succeed commercialization and SMEs should collaborate with production and marketing departments from the early stage of R&D.
        4,000원
        5.
        2023.02 서비스 종료(열람 제한)
        본 논문에서는 2000년-2020년까지 중국의 연구개발비 투자와 기술비지니스 창업보육센터가 R&D 투자 성과에 미치는 영향에 관하여 분석하였다. R&D는 한 나라 경제의 지속적 성장을 위한 필수적인 요소로 자본과 노동의 추가 투입에 의한 경제성장이 점차 한계에 접어드는 경제구조에 있어서는 더욱 중요한 요소로 인식되고 있다. 올해 3분기 중국의 경제성장률이 3.9%로 예상을 뛰어넘기는 했지만 여전히 4% 미만으로 이전의 고성장 국면으로 반등이 어려울 것으로 예측되고 있다. 무역이 경제성장의 절대적인 요소로 자리매김하는 우리나라의 경우에는 중국이 세계 경제성장의 1/3 이상을 담당하는 상황에서 중국의 경제성장률 둔화는 부담스러울 수밖에 없다. 중국의 R&D 투자를 살펴보고 R&D 활동을 통한 산출물을 분석함으로써 중국 경제의 지속적인 성장 가능성은 논하고자 한다.
        6.
        2019.02 KCI 등재 서비스 종료(열람 제한)
        Purpose - Research on the ability of domestic public institutions to conduct business is being conducted. Research on government support policy for public technology projects, emphasizes technology creation. Public agencies are encouraging evolutionary barriers at the stage of realistic business. This paper presents the policy possibilities by presenting policies and strategies based on corporate public policy. Research design, data, and methodology – In this study, we surveyed the actual state of public technology commercialization based on the data on state of technology commercialization of public institutions. We collected and analyzed the literature data to enhance the competitiveness of technology commercialization by identifying success cases of public technology commercialization. In Korea, there are not many research papers that provide policy alternatives for technical commercialization of public research institutes. Therefore, in this paper, we review various government policies and check the status of technology commercialization to increase its value. Results – As a result of this study, it is suggested that various policy development is necessary for the commercialization of public technology, because it is important to increase the value of technology users, suppliers, investors and customers through various network activation. In particular, it is necessary to establish differentiated Korean public technology commercialization model for the proliferation of public technology commercialization by presenting methodical model of technical commercialization. Conclusions - Through this study, it is important to raise the competitiveness of domestic public technology commercialization, to create economic value, and to improve the performance of technology commercialization. Therefore, it is necessary to contribute to the creation of research achievement, research method of excellent technology, and method of commercializing technology, and to create achievement of technical commercialization in the future. In addition, from the viewpoint of commercialization of technology, strategies for creating value through utilization of public technology should be prepared, and a plan for mutual prosperity among domestic companies should be prepared. Policy alternatives of various public technology commercialization to build national competitiveness have been developed, and various examples of performance for the performance of public technology commercialization should be derived.