이 연구는 중국의 이미지 처리 소프트웨어 메이투를 중심으로 하여 기 술수용이론을 적용하고 확장하여 중국 사용자들의 이미지 처리 소프트웨 어 사용 의도에 대한 가능성을 탐구하는 것이다. 이를 위해 설문조사 방 법을 사용하여 사회의 다양한 계층의 다양한 그룹을 조사하고 수집한 데 이터를 분석했다. 연구 결과는 사용자의 사용 의도에 영향을 미치는 것 으로 나타났으며, 특히 사용자의 편리성과 유용성에 더해, 호기심과 자아 형상 일치성도 메이투 사용자의 사용 의도에 긍정적인 영향을 미치는 것 으로 나타났다. 본 논문의 연구 결과는 메이투와 같은 이미지 편집 소프 트웨어의 개발과 운영에 가치 있는 통찰을 제공할 수 있다.

Historically, rhythm has played a key role not only in musical composition, but also in architectural design. In 1893, architectural theorist and art scholar August Schmarsow, in "The Essence of Architectural Creation,” created a new definition of architecture as space-creation and characterized rhythm as a design principle. However, this new idea was confronted by Heinrich Wölfflin. While Schmarsow’s theory represents a dynamic world-view based on anthropomorphism, the architectural theory of Wölfflin is based on the notion of harmony, displaying a kind of conservative stasis. These two main streams have greatly influenced the development of modern architecture. The concept of space has prevailed in the discourse of modern architecture, but the principle of rhythm has seldom received any positive recognition. This article introduces and develops the concept of rhythm and disputes whether Behrens and Frankl in particular, two who dispute Schmarsow’s theories, have used the concept of rhythm in terms of space. I conclude that they could not overcome the notion of the physical—the body —, thus their use of the term rhythm is incongruous with the notion of space. The idea of rhythm in architectural creation remains an up and coming idea.

테러리스트의 급진화와 관련해서 이들이 교도소에서 다른 수용자들에 대한 급진화를 양산한다는 문제점이 오래전부터 제기되어왔다. 교도소가 테러리스트들에 의한 급진화로 다른 수용자들을 테러리스트로 극단화하 는 전향을 위한 최적의 장소의 역할을 한다는 점이다. 특히 이슬람 극단 주의의 지하디즘의 영향력이 미국과 유럽 등에서 자국민 테러리스트로 연결되고 있다는 문제들로 인해 교도소 내의 극단주의 급진화에 대한 우 려가 더욱 커지고 있다. 그러나 이에 관한 주제에 대한 과학적이고 개관 적인 학문적 연구는 아직까지 매우 부진하다. 교도소 내의 테러리즘 급 진화의 실체, 관련 위험요인 등을 객관적으로 파악하여 정책적 대안을 수립하고 관련 실무자들과 학자들의 이해를 높일 필요가 절실히 요구된 다. 이 같은 연구의 필요성에 따라 이 연구는 테러리스트를 일반 교도소 에 수용하는 양형과 관련된 내용을 미국의 법률을 중심으로 간략히 소개 하고, 교도소 내의 테러리스트의 특성과 일반범죄자와의 차이점, 급진화 와 관련된 교도소 내 위험성, 그리고 급진화를 통한 교도소 내의 테러리 스트 모집과 관련된 이론적 모델 등에 대해 논의하였다.

본 논문은 이탈리아의 살아있는 법이론의 개괄적인 소개와 이 이론이 프랑스에 어떻게 수용되었는지를 살펴보는 것을 그 목적으로 한다. 이탈리아의 살아있는 법이론은 심판대상 법률규정에 대한 법원의 견고한 해석이 존재하는 경우 헌법재판소는 이와 같은 법원의 해석을 우선적으로 고려해야 한다는 이론으로 헌법재판소의 일종의 자기제한을 전제조건으로 하는 이론이다. 이와 관련하여 프랑스 헌법재판소의 경우 파기원과 국사원의 판례에 대해서만 살아있는 법으로 인정하고 있으며, 이탈리아 헌법재판소와 달리 헌법재판소 자기 자신이 최고법원의 해석을 대체하는 한정적 해석을 하는 적극적인 모습을 보여주고 있는 것이 특징적이다.

We try to test the pecking order theory of Korean fisheries firm’s capital structure using debt capacity. At first, we estimate the debt capacity as the probability of assigning corporate bond rating from credit-rating agencies. We use logit regression model to estimate this probability as a proxy of debt capacity. The major results of this study are as follows. Firstly, we can confirm the fisheries firm’s financing behaviour which issues new debt securities for financial deficit. Empirical test of SSM model indicates that the higher probability of assigning corporate bond rating, the higher the coefficient of financial deficit. Especially, high probability group follows this result exactly. Therefore, the pecking order theory of fisheries firm’s capital structure applies well for high probability group which means high debt capacity. It also applies for medium and low probability group, but their significances are not good. Secondly, the most of fisheries firms in high probability group issue new debt securities for their financial deficit. Low probability group’s fisheries firms also issue new debt securities for their financial deficit within the limit of their debt capacity, but beyond debt capacity they use equity financing for financial deficit. Therefore, the pecking order theory on debt capacity come into existence well in high probability group.

The purpose of this study was to examine the intention of consumer acceptance of technology in agricultural production by applying the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) to smart farm. In particular, this study analyzed the intention to accept the technology of agricultural students, farmers, start-up farmers, returning farmers, and returnees in the general manufacturing industry and high-tech industries, and in agricultural sectors corresponding to primary industries. The results showed that performance expectancy, social influence, facilitating conditions, IT development level, and reliability had a significant influence on the intention to use smart farm technology. However, effort expectancy and price value were rejected because no significant impact on use intention was tested. In addition, the influences of the variables showing their influence were reliability (β=.569) > IT development level (β=.252) > social influence (β=.235) > performance expectancy (β=.182) > facilitating conditions (β=.134).

Purpose – There are common factors both in Technology Readiness and Acceptance Model and Technology Paradox Theory which can be put together and made in one unified model. The unified model can provide the following merits. First, the unified model is simple but contains factors of the models. Second, the unified model can clarify the process of technology acceptance of common consumers. Third, the unified model can provide the opportunities to analyze the negative sides of new technology, thus find ways to improve the level of acceptance by general consumers. Research design, data, and methodology – The 450 questionnaires were handed out to people around Seoul and 421 were collected. Except insincere and wrong-marked ones, 402 were used to analyze. SPSS program was used to analyze. Factor analysis, regression analysis was conducted to test the hypotheses. Results – By analyzing sub-factors of both models and binding the common factors in one category, we accomplish one model. And we tested the model by empirical method. The results show that the results from the unified model are almost same as the results from the two models. In other words, the unified model works. Conclusions – Explaining one state of affair by two different method is in some sense distracting attention. By devising a new model including factors of both models, we can explain the affair more straightforward and efficiently. At first the technology acceptance model was devised to explain the technology users in an organization and the following tests and revised models were for the similar purposes. However, as on-lone activities including contracts have been expanded and become important, consumers as the technology uses have emerged as first factor to consider. In accordance models to explain this situation has been suggested. The model suggested in this research is one of the models but it has the following merits. That is, it is simple but has strong explanation power, it can clarify the process of technology acceptance of common consumers by containing negative sides of consumer conception, and thus, it can provide the opportunities to analyze the negative sides of new technology, also find ways to improve the level of acceptance by general consumers.