검색결과

검색조건
좁혀보기
검색필터
결과 내 재검색

간행물

    분야

      발행연도

      -

        검색결과 12

        1.
        2019.09 KCI 등재 구독 인증기관 무료, 개인회원 유료
        본 연구는 중국의 28개 도시풍경명승구에서 선정한 200개 디지털 이미지를 대상으로 경관의 매력도에 영향을 미치는 경관요소 및 시각조형요소의 선호도를 분석하였으며, 그 결과를 정리하면 다음과 같다. 첫째, 중국내 관련 선행연구들을 종합하여 28가지 경관요소 및 7개 경관의 시각조형요소를 선정하였으며, 직관평가법을 이용하여 이들에 대한 선호도를 평가한 결과, 경관요소의 시각적 선호도는 꽃, 잔디, 유희시설 및 정원시설물의 순으로 나타났으며, 시각조형요소는 규모, 색상 및 상대위치의 선호도가 높은 것으로 분석되었다. 둘째, 요인분석 결과 28개 경관요소는 8개의 경관요인(관광서비스, 수경시설, 안전·지도시설, 매력물, 식물, 도로·광장, 자연풍경 및 지형요인)으로 설명될 수 있었다. 셋째, 도출된 경관요인 및 시각조형요소를 대상으로 피평가자들의 선호도 성향을 분석(T-검정, 분산분석)하였다. 경관요인의 경우 매력물 및 식물재료에서 성별에 따른 선호도 차이를 보였는데, 정원, 문화유적 등을 포함하는 매력물의 경우 여성이 남성보다 높은 점수를, 식물재료의 경우 남성이 여성보다 높은 점수를 주었다. 연령별로는 도로·광장인자의 경우 40세 이상의 평가자들이 20대 이하의 젊은 층에 비하여 높은 점수를 주었다. 시각조형요소 중 색상요소의 경우 여성이 남성보다 선호도가 높게 나타났다. 결론적으로 명승구 계획에 있어 자연경관뿐 아니라 안내판, 안전지도 등의 관광기반시설 설치가 중요한 경관요소임을 알 수 있었으며, 주 이용객의 특성을 반영한 설계가 이루어져야 함을 알 수 있었다.
        4,000원
        2.
        2021.10 KCI 등재 서비스 종료(열람 제한)
        A well-maintained landscape can increase the competitiveness of a city. Gyeongju which is the famous ancient capital of Korea, has numerous historical resources. However, the disharmony between the historical landscape and the surrounding landscape weakens the competitiveness of the city. At present, most landscape analysis methods mainly focus on plans, photos, and animation, which have certain limitations in the expression of landscape spatial scale and materials. This study aimed to use the virtual walkthrough method to take the Wolseong District of Gyeongju historical areas as the object in order to evaluate the landscape visually. Compared with planar landscape analysis methods, such as photos and videos, the virtual walkthrough method is more immersive and intuitive to experience the spatial scale. The study results revealed images, visual characteristics, and visual influence factors of the landscape, which provide essential data for the construction and improvement of landscapes in similar historical areas in the future.
        3.
        2018.11 KCI 등재 서비스 종료(열람 제한)
        A Visual landscape planning and management system has been introduced and implemented by each ministry so as to solve the problems of visual landscape destruction due to recognition on the value of natural landscape of beautiful territory and various development projects. At present, this system emphasizes the importance of the visual and perceptual aspect of the landscape however, there is a lack of techniques required for comprehensively predicting, evaluating, and managing it. Furthermore, sustainable landscape management after the completion of development projects has been inadequately carried out, as the focus has been only on consultation in the planning process of the development project in institutional performance. To this end, we presented objective and standardized criteria to predict and judge the effects of development projects on landscapes before project implementation. During the implementation of the development project, the influence of the visual landscape becomes accumulated in the construction progress stage. There is a need to identify the main viewpoints and to examine the continuous changes in the landscape-influencing factors, owing to the remarkable influences on the landscape, such as the change in the topography and the change caused by the artificial structure. During the stage of managing the influence on the visual landscape after the completion of the project, the influence on landscape should be monitored by measuring the change in the continuous landscape-influencing factors and determining the extent to which the actual reduction plan has been implemented. These processes should be performed continuously to maintain the quality of the visual landscape. The change in the landscape caused by the development project is shown to cause relatively greater visual damage than other factors composing the landscape owing to the influence of the artificial factors including the structure or the building. This shows that not only detailed examination of the visual impact before the development project but also continuous management is required during and after the development project. For this purpose, we derived eight landscape-influencing factors including form/shape, line, color, texture, scale/volume, height, skyline, and landscape control point. The proposed considering to be of high utilization in that it has a clear target of the landscape influencing factors.
        4.
        2016.08 KCI 등재 서비스 종료(열람 제한)
        Due to the Korea's topographic characteristic, there are a lot of marine bridges to connect between islands and mainland. In addition, marine bridges play an important role in a regional landscape. For these reasons, landscape design of bridge is necessary in order to improve beautification of region. So, this studies analyzed image and landscape preference of marine bridges in rural area. The main results were summarized as follows: When rating the image of the background in sea and mountain image, ‘stable’ and ‘natural’ were rated highly. When rating the image of the arch bridge in sea and mountain image, ‘beautiful’, and ‘attractive’ were rated highly. When rating the image of the cable-stayed bridge in sea and mountain image, ‘splendid’, and ‘attractive’ were rated highly. When rating the image of the suspension bridge in sea and mountain image, ‘beautiful’, and ‘splendid’ were rated highly. Next, When rating the image of the background in sea and building image, ‘stable’ and ‘natural’ were rated highly. When rating the image of the arch bridge in sea and building image, ‘beautiful’, and ‘splendid’ were rated highly. When rating the image of the cable-stayed bridge in sea and building image, ‘beautiful’, and ‘attractive’ were rated highly. When rating the image of the suspension bridge in sea and building image, ‘beautiful’, and ‘attractive’ were rated highly. And, The image of suspension bridges in sea and mountain image is more highly preferred than other image. The background in sea and mountain image is landscape of the lowest preference. In the mountain and sea image, the preference of suspension bridge landscape has the highest rating. In the sea and building image, the preference of arch bridge landscape has the highest rating. In conclusion, the results illustrate that the marine bridge's shape and its background in rural area are important elements of a visual preference. When designing the marine bridge, designer have to choose a proper bridge shape for its background. However, this research's limitation is that this research consider only bridge shape and background to analyze landscape preference of marine bridges. Therefore, further research is necessary to consider various elements.
        5.
        2016.06 KCI 등재 서비스 종료(열람 제한)
        Due to the rapid economic development of Korea, the bridge have been built by government over the several years. Additionally, there are too many mountain and river and the bridge have been built in rural area. But bridge designers weren't considering the bridge landscape. And bridge was a negative factor in regional landscape. Because of this, this study surveyed the landscape preferences of rural bridge landscapes according to different bridge types. The results were summarized as follows: And this research include conducting a study on visual preference according to the bridge's type and background. And, the landscape of arch bridge in the river 1 is landscape of the highest preference. The the landscape of girder bridge in the river 2 is landscape of the lowest preference. In the river 1 and 2 landscape, high preference is observed in the arch bridge and low preference is noted in the girder bridge. In the mountain 1 and 2 landscape, high preference is observed in the cable-stayed bridge and low preference is noted in the girder bridge. In conclusion, the visual preference of bridge landscape depend on the background and bridge shape, the study said. Therefore, when bridge designer design the bridge, designer have to choose proper bridge shape according to the background. This research was conducted only in bridge landscape of rural area but the visual preference of bridge landscape can be changed according to the various background. And further research is needed to analyze visual preference of bridge landscape according to the various background.
        6.
        2008.04 KCI 등재 서비스 종료(열람 제한)
        본 연구는 항만경관에 대한 선호도를 분석한 것으로 부산의 북항을 연구 대상지로 설정하였다. 선호 요인은 SD법을 통해 도출되었고, 북항의 시각적 선호도와의 상관관계를 분석하기 위해 다중 회귀 분석을 실시하였다. 북항의 시각적 선호요인으로 역동성, 안정성, 쾌적성, 보건성의 4개 요인으로 구성되었다. 4개의 선호요인을 이용한 시각적 선호도 분석 결과, 역동성 요인이 상대적으로 북항 선호를 설명하는 가장 중요한 요인으로 나타났다. 그러므로 북항 경관의 창출 및 관광객을 위한 항만 이미지 조성에 역동성을 고려한 항만경관계획과 관광 매력물로써의 개발을 통해 북항경관의 시각적 질 관리를 추진해야할 것으로 사료된다.
        7.
        2008.03 KCI 등재 서비스 종료(열람 제한)
        Based on the result of extraction of common factors executed in order to elucidate the visual attributes of street scenery by types through the rotation of 23 adjective variables by Varimax, the visual attributes expressed after the construction of the facilities using street scenery were anylized to be 4 factors including factor 1 through factor 4. The explanation of the 4 factor groups to explain the entire distribution was 65.3% and these factor groups are the psychological attributes felt when using facilities are constructed by securing the street spaces in downtowns and the factors were named as naturalness(factor 1), locality(factor 2), identity(factor 3) and clarity(factor 4) respectively. Based on the result of one-way layout distribution analysis, the preferences for street scenery by types were found out to show considerable differences at 1% significance level. Based on the result of multiple regression analysis, all of the factors explaining preferences including factor 1 through factor 4 were significant at 1 % significance level. In case other conditions are constant, if the values of the adjective variables related to locality(factor 2) increase by 1 unit, the preferences which are the values of dependent variables will increase by 0.709. The variable with the largest relative contribution among the 4 factor groups was the locality(factor 2) factor group and on the contrary, it was found that the independent variable with least influences was the clarity(factor 4) factor group.
        8.
        2004.05 KCI 등재 서비스 종료(열람 제한)
        The population hasincreases in urban increase geometrically, and then many problemsoccur in society anomity, environmental pollution, exhaustion of recourses, So we have to consider the quality of our life. Eco-village is the alternative the village's principle to consider the human life. Eco-village refers to the application to ecological principles to the development of human ecosystem in order to achieve sustainability. Since a few yearsm, in Korea, ecovillages have built for alternative society and developed local society. The expert and residents live ecovillages just consider the physical system or the social system. However, Ecovilliges must have not only unique physical, social aspects, but also the scenic aspects, especially, in the villages for eco-tourism. The paper examines what images are recognized by the people as ecovillages, and what difference betweenr they understand the functions and meaning each image or not. Through the result, this paper explores the important and necessity of the scenic landscape plan in ecovillages.
        9.
        1999.02 KCI 등재 서비스 종료(열람 제한)
        The purpose of this study is to find the bi-polar adjectives for rural stream landscape evaluation by the semantic differential scale and to suggest the major determinants of visual preference in rural stream landscapes. For this, the bi-polar adjectives for rural stream landscape evaluation was found by the method of the reliability test, and the spatial image was analyzed by the factor analysis. The level of visual preference was measured by slide simulation test, and these data were analyzed by the multiple regression. The major findings of this study can be summarized as follows : 1) Of the bi-polar adjectives expressing psychological and physical characteristics, the hi-polar adjectives which demonstrated reliability and consistency run as follows : Bi-polar adjectives expressing psychological characteristics : 'calm-bustling', 'unfamiliar-familiar', 'still-active','depressing-brisk', 'discomfortable-comfortable', 'suppressed-free', 'lifeless-living', 'quiet-noisy', 'unpleasant-pleasant'. Bi-polar adjectives expressing physical characteristics : 'artificial-natural', 'narrow-wide', 'rocky-not rocky', 'desolate-fertile', 'dirty-clean', 'enclosed-open', 'flat-steep', 'not gravelly-gravelly', 'thicketed-not thicketed', 'not weedy-weedy'. 2) Two factors, the harmony and the movement, were derived from the factor analysis for the psychological variables. Three factors, the naturalness, the rock, and the vegetation, were derived from the factor analysis for the physical variables. 3) Rural stream landscape types were classified into four types by the multi-dimensional scaling method. Type III, IV obtained higher rank of visual preference and type I, II obtained lower. 4) For all types, the factors determining the level of visual preference were found to be the harmony, the naturalness, and the vegetation. The visual preference determinants of rural stream landscape need to be considered in improving or restoring the rural stream landscapes.
        10.
        1998.12 서비스 종료(열람 제한)
        Seascape means the scenery which is composed around the sea., Seascape has it's own characteristics compared with landscape and has many important roles in our urban life. Nowadays seascape is being destructed by the development in waterfront area and ocean space. Especially the various kind of buildings which are built in coastal area give great visual impact on seascape. But we have rare research on seascape and no guideline for seascape planning. Before any action against destroying seascape the assessment of seascape has to be preceded. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the representative seascapes which are selected from over 300 slides of various seascapes according to the types of seascapes. We used S.D (Semantic Differential) method with 35 adjective pairs in seven scale to evaluate each seascape. The results can be summarized as follows. 1) Seascapes can be classified as natural type and urban type. The natural type can be divided into beach type and rock-island type. 2) Natural type of seascape is more prefered than urban type. 3)Beach type is the most prefered among seascape types. 4) Natural elements of seascape such as sky, water, sand, trees, forest, mountain, open space, waterfront line, are evaluated as 'good' to see but artificial elements, such as buildings, persons, roads, structures, are evaluated 'bad' to see. 5)As a result of factor analysis five factors(axes) are found out. They are 'wildness', 'vividness', 'preference', 'interest', and 'openness'. These factors can be used for evaluting any seascape.
        12.
        1998 서비스 종료(열람 제한)
        Seascape means the scenery which is composed around the sea. Seascape has it's own characteristics compared with landscape and has many important roles in our urban life. Nowadays seascape is being destructed by the development is waterfront area and ocean space. Especially the various kind of buildings which are built in coastal area give great visual impact on seascape. But we have rare research on seascape and no guideline for seascape planning. Before any action against destroying seascape the assessment of seascape has to be preceded. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the representative seascapes which are selected from over 300 slides of various seascapes according to the types of seascapes. We used S.D (Semantic Differential) method with 35 adjective pairs in seven scale to evaluate each seascape. The results can be summarized as follows. 1) Seascapes can be classified as natural type and urban type. The natural type can be divided into beach type and rock-island type. 2) Natural type of seascape is more prefered than urban type. 3) Beach type is the most prefered among seascape types. 4) Natural elements of seascape, such as sky, water, sand, trees, forest, mountain, open space, waterfront line, are evaluated as 'good'to see but artificial elements, such as buildings, persons, roads, structures, are evaluated 'bad'to see. 5) As a result of factor analysis five factors(axes) are found out. They are 'wildness', 'vividness', 'preference', 'interest', and 'openness'. These factors can be used for evaluting any seascape.