Background: Stroke patients experience multiple dysfunctions that include motor and sensory impairments. Therefore, new intervention methods require a gradational approach depending on functional levels of a stroke patient’s activity and should include cognition treatment to allow for a patient’s active participation in rehabilitation. Objects: This study investigates the effect of integrated revision of electrical sensory stimulation, which stimulates somatosensory and action observation training, which is synchronized cognition intervention method on stroke patients’ functions. Methods: Twenty-one stroke patients were randomized into two groups. The two groups underwent twenty minutes of intervention five times a week for three weeks. This study used an electromyogram to evaluate symmetric muscle activation of lower extremities and muscle onset time when performing sit to stand before and after intervention. A weight-bearing ratio was used to evaluate the weight-bearing of the affected side in a sit to standing. To evaluate sit to stand performance ability, this study performed five timed sit to stand tests. Results: The two groups both showed statistically significant improvement in muscle onset time of lower extremity, static balance ability in a standing position, and sit to stand performance after the intervention (p < 0.05). In addition, the action observation and synchronized electrical sensory stimulation group showed significant improvement in symmetric muscle activation of lower extremities and weight–bearing ratio of the affected side (p < 0.05). Conclusion: action observation and synchronized electrical sensory stimulation (AOT with ESS) can have positive effects on a stroke patient’s sit to stand performance, and the intervention method that provides integrated AOT with ESS can be used as new nervous system intervention program.

본 연구는 기술제휴 동기의 주요 이론적 배경인 거래비용이론(TCE)과 자원준거이론(RBV)의 기술제휴 파트너 선정기준, 거버넌스, 성과에 대한 설명력을 분석하였다. 기술제휴의 동기인 TCE와 RBV의 통합 분석 관점에서 기술제휴의 각 단계, 즉 기술 제휴 파트너 선정기준, 거버넌스, 성과에 미치는 영향을 측정하였다. 실증연구 결과, 국내 하이테크(High-Tech) 기업의 기술제휴 파트너 선정 시 TCE 관점과 RBV 관점이 복합적으로 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났으며, 거버넌스 유형 선택에는 TCE 관점이 보다 설명력이 있는 것으로 나타났다. 기술제휴의 성과에는 TCE 관점과 RBV 관점 모두 관계가 있지만 RBV 관점의 설명력이 다소 큰 것으로 나타났다. 기술제휴 각 단계에 영향을 미치는 양 이론의 세부 변수를 제시하고, 영향을 미치는 원인을 분석하여 제시하였다. 본 연구의 결론에서는 연구결과에 대한 요약과 시사점 및 한계점에 대하여 기술하였다.