This paper aimed to identify the units of measuring scale in Hwangnyongsa temple planning with the published excavation survey reports. Hwangyongsa temple site was planned under Silla Capital’s urban planning in 6～7C, its full size was 800×800, and main temple was 400×515 of Goguryeo’s system of measurement. Main hall was located in the center of Hwangnyongsa temple site, and its location could be seen that there was the arrangement of main temple divided into 3 : 2. Building plan measuring units proved to be 351～356㎜ and 294～ 296㎜ by analyzing measured data of remains. Lecture hall and Wooden pagoda were rebuilt by using the ancestors’ units of measuring scale again and Bell hall was not planned by Tang’s system of measurement in middle of 8C. In this respect, it would be important to have a deliberate attitude and lay down stereotypes on research of the units of measuring scale in ancient architecture.

Background: The assessment tool developed in other countries should be translated into Korean language using rigorous methodological approaches in order to be used in Korea. Because these procedures are insufficient for establishing the cross-cultural and linguistic equivalence, the need for statistical methods is raised. The Fullerton Advanced Balance Scale was translated into Korean and the content validity was verified through the back translation method, but the reliability and validity have not yet been proven by statistical methods. Objects: The purpose of this study was to investigate the reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Fullerton Advanced Balance Scale (KFAB) by statistical methods in elderly people. Methods: A total of 97 elderly adults (39 males and 58 females) participated in this study. Internal consistency of the KFAB was measured using Cronbach’s alpha and an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess test-retest reliability between the two measurement sessions. Concurrent validity was measured by comparing the KFAB responses with the Korean version of the Berg Balance Scale (KBBS) using the Spearman correlation coefficient. Construct validity of the KFAB was measured using the exploratory factor analysis to evaluate the unidimensionality of the questionnaire. The significance level was set at α=.05. Results: The internal consistency of the KFAB was found be adequate with Cronbach’s alpha (.96), and test-retest reliability was excellent as evidenced by the high ICC (r=.996). Concurrent validity showed high correlation between the KFAB and KBBS (r=.89, p<.001). Construct validity was evaluated using exploratory factor analysis. The result from Bartlett test of sphericity was statistically significant (p<.001), and the value of Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measure of sampling adequacy was .93. Exploratory factor analysis revealed the existence of only one dominant factor that explained 76.43% of the variance. Conclusion: The KFAB is a reliable, valid and appropriate tool for measuring the balance functions in elderly people.

Background: Rasch analysis estimates the probability that a respondent will endorse an item and select a particular rating for that item. It has the advantage of placing both the items and the person along a single ration scale and calibrates person ability and item difficulty onto an interval scale by logits. In addition, Rasch analysis is a useful tool for exploring the validity of questionnaires that have been developed using traditional methods. Therefore, it has been recommended as a method for developing and evaluating functional outcome measures. Objects: The purpose of this study was to investigate the item fit, item difficulty, and rating scale of the Korean version of the Fullerton Advanced Balance Scale (KFAB) using Rasch analysis. Methods: Total 97 subjects (39 males and 58 females) with dwelling elderly adults were participated, but 3 people were excluded for misfit persons. Rasch analysis was then done by means of the Winsteps program to determine the item fit, item difficulty, rating scale, and reliability of the KFAB. Results: In this study, the ‘standing with feet together and eyes closed’, ‘two-footed jump’, ‘walk with head turns’, and ‘stand on foam, eyes closed’ items shown misfit statistics. The most difficult item was ‘stand on one leg’, whereas the easiest item was ‘turn in full circle’. The rating scale was acceptable with all criteria. Both item and person separation indices and reliability showed acceptable values. This would indicated that each domain covers a useful range of item difficulty that is appropriate for measuring a person with a wide range of functional ability. Conclusion: The KFAB has been proven reliable, valid and an appropriate tool with which to evaluate the balance of the elderly people.

Park Jae-hyun & Kim Han-sham. 2015. “Study on Development of Broadcasting Language Assessment Scales using Analytic Hierarchy Process”. The Sociolinguistic Journal of Korea 23(3). 91~112. Existing discussions about assessment scales of broadcasting language had different assessment items according to the point of view and there were many restrictions to actually use them because no consideration was made to importance of assessment items. This study aims to develop assessment scales with high validity and effectiveness for broadcasting language. For this, logical structure of evaluation category and assessment items of broadcasting language were drawn on the basis of advanced researches on requirements for broadcasting language. With respect to evaluation category and assessment items of broadcasting language, weight rating was conducted on 14 Korean language experts and 14 broadcasting experts using the analytic hierarchy process. As for the evaluation category based on assessment result, relative importance was calculated in the order of fairness(31.5%), publicness(26.15%), accuracy(24.75%), and soundness(17.60%). As for the evaluation items, ranking was determined in the order of ‘Do you use expressions with low dignity?’, ‘Do you use discriminatory expressions?’, ‘Do you use biased expressions?’, and ‘Was incorrect transcription exposed on the subtitles?’ In addition to this, discussion was made about differences in evaluation outcome of Korean language experts and broadcasting experts.

본 연구의 목적은 아동의 성장발달과정에 중요한 영향을 미치는 의미 있는 성인, 특히 부모와 교사를 대상으로 관찰을 통한 상호작용코칭 역량을 파악할 수 있는 척도를 개발하기 위한 것이다. 척도는 이소희(2015)가 개발한 TREASURE Talk 코칭모델에 기반하여 2차에 걸친 문항개발과 2차에 걸친 타당성 검증을 통하여 개발하였다. 차 문항선정은 선행연구의 고찰을 통해 본 연구의 목적에 부합하는 300문항을 먼저 선정한 다음, 아동 전문가 10명에게 중복문항, 이중질문문항, 유사문항, 적합정도에 대한 리커트 5점척도를 활용하여 내용타당도를 실시하였으며 적합정도가 3.5미만인 208문항을 제외한 92문항이 선별되었다. 2차 문항 선정은 본 척도를 사용하게 될 대상자인 부모와 교사의 의견을 반영하고자 아동에게 의미 있는 성인 279명을 대상으로 내용타당도를 실시하였으며, 적합도가 3.5미만인 48문항을 제외한 44문항이 선별되었다. 선별된 44문항의 타당성 검증은 SPSS Statistics 21을 사용하였다. 1차 타당화는 수도권에 거주하는 성인 220명을 대상으로 탐색적 요인분석, 2차 타당화는 대도시권에 거주하는 성인 461명을 대상으로 확인적 요인분석을 실시하였다. 그 결과 신뢰도 계수(Cronbach α) .948로 각각 17문항의 TRE모듈과 URE모듈 2개의 요인으로 구성된 34문항의 관찰을 통한 아동-성인 상호작용코칭 척도(CICAIO: Coaching Inventory of Child-Adult Interaction through Observation)가 개발되었다. TRE 모듈은 ‘질문 전 상호작용’, URE 모듈은 ‘질문 후 상호작용’으로 명명하였다.

최근 조직의 커뮤니케이션에서 공중들이 중요하게 인식 및 평가하고 있는 진정성은 다양한 분야에서 연구들이 급증하고 있으나 서로 다른 개념적 정의와 측정으로 인하여 진정성 개념의 타당성과 다차원성에서 이론적 한계를 지니고 있다. 이에 본 연구는 보편적으로 사용가능한 커뮤니케이션 진정성의 측정을 위한 다차원적 개념의 표준 척도를 개발하고 대표적인 PR 활동인 CSR과 위기관리 분야에서의 차이를 살펴보고자 하였다. 기존 연구들을 바탕으로 도출한 21개의 측정항목들을 가지고 탐색적 요인분석을 한 결과에서 진정성은 이성적(진실성), 감성적(진심성), 그리고 행동적(실천성) 3가지 차원으로 구성됨을 확인하였다. 그리고 사전적 성향의 PR 활동인 CSR의 경우는 행동적 진정성이, 사후적 PR 활동인 위기관리 커뮤니케이션에서는 감성적 진정성이 다른 차원들보다 더욱 크게 공중의 커뮤니케이션 진정성 인식에 영향을 주는 것임을 알 수 있었다. 결국 커뮤니케이션 진정성은 진심, 진실, 실천의 의미를 포함하는 이성적, 감성적, 행동적 차원으로 구성된 다차원적 구성개념이라는 것이 확인되었다.

목적 : 행동적 편측무시를 평가하는 Catherine Bergego Scale (CBS)을 한국어로 번안하여 신뢰도와 타당도를 검증하기 위함에 있다. 연구방법 : 한국형 캐서린 버지고 척도(Korean Catherine Bergego Scale; K-CBS)의 개발을 위해 원 도구 개발자에게 한국에서의 번안과 사용을 허락 받았다. CBS 원문을 한글로 번안하여 번역-역번역 기 법에 따라 번역타당도를 구하고, 9명의 전문가에게 내용타당도를 확인하였다. 선 나누기 검사와 알버트 검사와의 상관계수를 이용하여 수렴타당도를 구하고, 요인분석을 통하여 구성타당도를 구하였다. 신뢰도 검증을 위해 내적일관성(Cronbach’s α와 항목이 삭제된 경우 Cronbach’s α)을 구하였다. 자료수집은 서울시에 소재한 병원에 입원, 외래로 재활치료를 받는 뇌졸중으로 인한 왼쪽 편마비 환자 127명을 대 상으로 2013년 10월부터 2014년 04월까지 진행되었다. 결과 : 번역-역번역 기법에 따라 번역타당도가 수립되었고, 전문가에 의한 내용타당도지수는 .98로 매우 높게 나타났다. 수렴타당도는 Pearson 상관계수가 선 나누기 검사(r=.719), 알버트 검사(r=.671)로 K-CBS와의 상관관계가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 구성타당도를 위한 요인분석 결과 10개의 항목이 모두 하나의 요인으로 묶였다. 내적일관성은 .956으로 항목간 관련성이 높은 것으로 나타났고, 해당 문항이 제거 되었을 때의 Cronbach’s α값보다 높아지는 항목은 없었다. 결론 : K-CBS는 한국에 거주하는 뇌졸중 환자들에게 적용하였을 때 행동적 편측무시를 평가하는 도구로 써 높은 수준의 신뢰도와 타당도가 검증되어 국내에서의 적용가능성을 보여주었다. 추후에는 K-CBS의 임상에서의 활용도를 높이기 위해 검사자간, 검사자내 신뢰도 검증 등 다양한 후속 연구들이 진행되어야 할 것이다. 주제어 : 뇌졸중, 신뢰도, 타당도, 편측무시, 한국형 캐서린 버지고 척도

There have been various studies on measurements of flood risk and forecasting models. For river and dam region, PDF and FVI has been proposed for measurement of flood risk and regression models have been applied for forecasting model. For Bo region unlikely river or dam region, flood risk would unexpectedly increase due to outgoing water to keep water amount under the designated risk level even the drain system could hardly manage the water amount. GFI and general linear model was proposed for flood risk measurement and forecasting model. In this paper, FVI with the consideration of duration on GFI was proposed for flood risk measurement at Bo region. General linear model was applied to the empirical data from Bo region of Nadong river to derive the forecasting model of FVI at three different values of Base High Level, 2m, 2.5m and 3m. The significant predictor variables on the target variable, FVI were as follows: ground water level based on sea level with negative effect, difference between ground altitude of ground water and river level with negative effect, and difference between ground water level and river level after Bo water being filled with positive sign for quantitative variables. And for qualitative variable, effective soil depth and ground soil type were significant for FVI.

This study investigated the relationship between function classification systems and the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI) functional skills in children with cerebral palsy (CP). Two hundred and eleven children with CP participated in this study. The Korean-Gross Motor Function Classification System (K-GMFCS), Korean-Manual Ability Classification System (K-MACS), Korean-Communication Function Classification System (K-CFCS), and self-care, mobility, and social function domains of the Korean-Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (K-PEDI) functional skills were measured by physical therapists or occupational therapists. All of the function classification systems were significantly correlated with PEDI functional skills (rs=-.549 to -.826) (p<.05). Especially, K-GMFCS, K-MACS, and K-CFCS were correlated significantly with mobility, self-care, and social function, respectively. Using stepwise multiple regression analysis, we established that K-GMFCS, K-MACS, and K-CFCS were predictors of self-care skills (74.3%) and mobility skills (79.5%) of the K-PEDI (p<.05). In addition, K-CFCS and K-MACS were predictors of social function (65.9%) of the K-PEDI (p<.05). The information gathered in this study using the levels measured in the function classification systems may be useful to clinicians for estimating the PEDI functional skills in children with CP.

This study is to review retirement function measures for estimating capital stocks. The measures include Retirement Probability Density Function(RPDF), Retirement Cumulative Distribution Function(RCDF), Retirement Survival Function(RSF) and Retirement Rate Function(RRF). The paper also provides the recommendations for using RRF as a distinct identification of the retirement curve functions for empirical service lives data.

This research discusses the characteristics and the implementation strategies for two types of quality metrics to analyze innovation effects in six sigma projects: fixed specification type and moving specification type. Zst, Ppk are quality metrics of fixed specification type that are influenced by predetermined specification. In contrast, the quality metrics of moving specification type such as Strictly Standardized Mean Difference(SSMD), Z-Score, F-Statistic and t-Statistic are independent from predetermined specification. Zst sigma level obtains defective rates of Parts Per Million(PPM) and Defects Per Million Opportunities(DPMO). However, the defective rates between different industrial sectors are incomparable due to their own technological inherence. In order to explore relative method to compare defective rates between different industrial sectors, the ratio of specification and natural tolerance called, Ppk, is used. The drawback of this Ppk metric is that it is highly dependent on the specification. The metrics of F-Statistic and t-Statistic identify innovation effect by comparing before-and-after of accuracy and precision. These statistics are not affected by specification, but affected by type of statistical distribution models and sample size. Hence, statistical significance determined by above two statistics cannot give a same conclusion as practical significance. In conclusion, SSMD and Z-Score are the best quality metrics that are uninfluenced by fixed specification, theoretical distribution model and arbitrary sample size. Those metrics also identify the innovation effects for before-and-after of accuracy and precision. It is beneficial to use SSMD and Z-Score methods along with popular methods of Zst sigma level and Ppk that are commonly employed in six sigma projects. The case studies from national six sigma contest from 2011 to 2012 are proposed and analyzed to provide the guidelines for the usage of quality metrics for quality practitioners.

Ⅰ. 서 론 Ⅱ. 고령친화제품 · 서비스의 개념화 Ⅲ. 고령친화 소비욕구 척도의 개발 Ⅳ. 결 론

본 연구는 세계 최대 소비시장으로 성장하고 있는 중국 소비자의 G감성 유형별 특징을 알아보고, 감성별 소비형태 및 선호 컬러를 분석하여 중국시장을 위한 기초자료로 제공하는데 목적이 있다. 조사를 위해 중국 4개 도시의 소비자를 대상으로 G감성 및 소비 형태에 대한 설문을 실시하였다. G감성유형을 분류한 결과 중국 소비자는 자신의 가치관과 정체성에 따라 행동하며, 합리적이고 논리적인 소비를 추구하는 G1유형이 가장 많이 나타났으며, 선행연구의 한국소비자에서 가장 많이 나타난 G3유형과는 다른 시장 성격을 나타냈다. 소비의 특성으로 중국소비자는 백화점에서 의류 구입을 선호하고 있으며, G2유형의 경우 백화점 다음으로 로드샵을 선호하고 있어 G감성에서 제시한 행동범위가 넓고 소비가 많은 행동파의 유형특성과 일치하고 있다. 중국소비자는 의복구매 시개인이 선호하는 컬러를 우선 구입하고 있으며, 무채색의 선호 비중이 매우 높게 나타났다. 무채색에서 검정의 비율이 가장 높았으며, 백색, 짙은 회색, 옅은 회색의 순으로 조사되었다. 유채색에서는 브라운, 오렌지, 빨강, 파랑의 순으로 나타났으며, G4유형의 경우 다른 유형에 비하여 다양한 색채 선호를 보였다. 이러한 결과는 패션디자인과 기업의 마케팅전략 기초자료로 활용 할 수 있으며, 소비자를 위한 새로운 커뮤니케이션 방법으로 활용할 수 있다.

본 연구는 교정시설/소년원학교에서 실시되고 있는 문화예술교육 효과성을 측정할 수 있는 측정도구를 개발하는데 목적이 있다. 이를 위해 우선적으로 문헌검토를 통하여 이론적 근간을 마련하고, 현재 교정시설/소년원학교에서 운영되고 있는 문화예술교육 프로그램의 목적과 목표를 분석하고 문화예술 강사들의 포커스그룹 인터뷰 및 전문가와의 논의를 거쳐 문화예술교육 효과성의 구성개념과 예비문항을 구성하였다. 프로그램의 참여자들의 문항의 이해도를 높이기 위해 파일럿 테스트를 실시하고 윤문작업을 거쳤으며, 이후 탐색적 요인분석과 문항스크린 작업을 하였다. 본 조사는 2회로 나누어 실시하였는데, 1차 조사 설문지의 배포와 수거는 2011년 8월 10일부터 8월 20일에 걸쳐 시행하였으며, 총 842명(교정시설 589명, 소년원학교 253명)이 참여하였다. 2차 조사는 1차 조사의 분석결과를 바탕으로 문항조정을 실시하여 설문조사하였으며, 조사기간은 2011년 12월 10일부터 30일까지였으며, 총 691명(교정시설 505명, 소년원학교 186명)이 참여하였다. 측정된 결과는 문항스크린(기술통계치, 신뢰도 등), 탐색적 요인분석, 확인적 요인분석 순으로 분석하였다. 탐색적 요인분석 결과 6개 요인, 63개 문항으로 최종 척도가 구성되었다. 전체 문화예술교육 효과성 척도의 신뢰도는 .927로 양호한 결과를 보였으며, 확인적 요인분석을 수행한 결과, 모형적합도 지수 또한 적절한 것으로 판단되었다. 따라서 교정시설/소년원학교 문화예술교육 효과성을 측정하기 위한 척도는 최종적으로 ‘스트레스 17문항’, ‘사회성 17문항’, ‘문화예술 선호성 7문항’, ‘긍정성 10문항’, ‘자기조절력 8문항’, ‘표현력 4문항’의 6요인, 63개 문항으로 구성하였다.

F-Measure is one of the external measures for evaluating the validity of clustering results. Though it has clear advantages over other widely used external measures such as Purity and Entropy, F-Measure has inherently been less sensitive than other validity measures. This insensitivity owes to the definition of F-Measure that counts only most influential portions. In this research, we present Fn-Measure, an external cluster evaluation measure based on F-Measure. Fn-Measure is so sensitive that it can detect their difference in the cases that F-Measure cannot detect the difference in clustering results. We compare Fn-Measure to F-Measure for a few clustering results and show which measure draws better result based upon homogeneity and completeness

F-Measure is one of the external validity indexes for evaluating clustering results and has been widely used.Though it has clear advantage over other widely usedexternal measures such as Purity and Entropy, FMeasure has inherently been less sensitive than other validity indexes in some cases. This insensitivity owes to the definition of F-Measure that counts only most influential portions. In this research, we define a new validity index based on F-Measure, called Fn-Measure and show that it can detect the difference in the cases that original F-Measure cannot detect the difference in clustering results.

This paper aims to develop a new chain metrics for obtaining lean Overall Equipment Effectiveness(OEE) and present implementation strategy which considers the properties for Total Productive Maintenance(TPM) to reduce machine losses, Performance Analysis and Control(PAC) to reduce labor losses, Lean Production System(LPS) to reduce floor wastes, and Theory of Constraints(TOC) to minimize the problem of Capacity Constrained Resource(CCR). The study reviews the related literatures and reformulates the structure of machine losses, labor losses and field wastes. The research also develops the integrated productivity metrics according to time, units, reliability and maintainability. It is found that the study develops the actual productivity measure in terms of efficiency, effectiveness and standard productivity. In addition to that, it outlines and develops by using the integrated LPS and TPM, lean OEE measures such as Time Based Productivity(TBP), Unit Based Productivity(UBP), and Reliability & Maintainability Based Availability(RMBA). Implication examples are proposed to make it easier and available for practioners to understand the implementation strategies about TPM OEE, lean OEE and TOC OEE. Futhermore related to other studies, the research contributes to create a new chain productivity measures to clear the interrelationship concepts of productivity, efficiency and effectiveness. Moreover the paper develops the enhanced OEE measures by integration of TPM, PAC, LPS and TOC with the perspective of schedule, throughput, reliability, maintainability and availability.

The research discusses interrelationship of structural and reliability importance measures which used in the probabilistic safety assessment. The most frequently used component importance measures, such as Birnbaum's Importance (BI), Risk Reduction (RR), Risk Reduction Worth (RRW), RA (Risk Achievement), Risk Achievement Worth (RAW), Fussel Vesely (FV) and Critically Importance (CI) can be derived from two structure importance measures that are developed based on the size and the number of Minimal Path Set (MPS) and Minimal Cut Set (MCS). In order to show an effectiveness of importance measures which is developed in this paper, the three representative functional structures, such as series-parallel, k out of n and bridge are used to compare with Birnbaum's Importance measure. In addition, the study presents the implementation examples of Total Productive Maintenance (TPM) metrics and alternating renewal process models with exponential distribution to calculate the availability and unavailability of component facility for improving system performances. System state structure functions in terms of component states can be converted into the system availability (unavailability) functions by substituting the component reliabilities (unavailabilities) for the component states. The applicable examples are presented in order to help the understanding of practitioners.