본 과업은 핵심적인 농촌자원이자 경관생태자원인 마을숲 및 주변의 시설을 활용하여 지역 및 마을의 경관생태적 복원 및 공동체성 회복을 위한 경관계획적 대안을 제시하는 것을 그 목적으로 하고 있다. 대상지는 장수군 장수읍에 위치한 노하숲으로, 현재 이곳을 포함한 장수읍 일원은 2017년부터 농촌중심지 활성화사업 선도지구사업이 활발히 진행 중에 있다. 계획의 비전 및 방향을 “사람과 숲이 어우러진 행복공감 커뮤니티 숲 조성”로 설정하였으며, 훼손되어온 노하숲의 생태적 가치를 보전하면서도 주민 활용성을 극대화할 수 있도록 계획하였다. 장수군 노인/장애인복지관, 행복나눔센터(계획) 등 주변시설의 앞마당 공간을 제공하여 휴게, 놀이, 여가 등 다양한 활동을 수행할 수 있도록 하며, 동선계획의 경우 무장애 순환형 동선을 구축하여 다양한 계층의 이용 편의성을 향상시키며, 동선계획으로 주 진출입부와 단절된 내부동선을 연결하였으며, 인접한 시설들과의 접근성을 향상시켰다. 기본 구상으로 첫째, UNESCO MAB의 기준에 따라 핵심구역은 생태숲으로, 완충구역은 정원숲을 그리고 협력(전이)구역은 피크닉숲으로 조성 및 유지·관리하고자 한다. 둘째 남동, 북서측에 진입마당을 설치하여 개방감을 확보하고 진입인지성과 편의성을 증진한다. 셋째, 나무놀이터, 그늘쉼터를 조성하여 아이들과 젊은 엄마들의 휴게, 놀이 및 정보공유의 공간으로 활용하도록 한다. 기본구상에 따른 주요 공간은 진입마당, 정원쉼터, 건강쉼터, 숲학습장 및 피크닉숲 등으로 구성하였다.

The purpose of this study is to establish how community garden spaces should be used to restore communities engaged in village-rehabilitation projects. To achieve this purpose, we have analyzed the perceptions of local residents conducting a town-development project. The community reviewed the benefits of having a garden to improve the residents’ quality of life and comfort. Given the role of gardens in revitalizing communities, it is necessary to build spaces where residents can relax and enjoy community life. Those who participated in this study hoped that their community garden would provide shade and relaxation, a children’s play area, green spaces, and places for conversation. The space and facilities provided by community gardens vary, in accordance with the expectations and needs of each community. It is therefore inappropriate to apply uniform garden designs to all community gardens. Between 20% and 25% of a community garden should be allocated to each of the following: community space, ornamental space, and space for relaxation. As plants that provide shade and help to maintain the ecosystem are strongly preferred in community gardens, all plants should be chosen for their environmental benefits and functionality, rather than aesthetics. Residents may be willing to participate in a range of activities, including community events, the cultivation of plants, and garden management. Towns must therefore set up programs to support these activities. It is essential to continue studying and investigating the formation of community spaces and facilities, reflecting the characteristics of each community.

In this study, the effectiveness of the method for the promotion council to make rehabilitation community development plan with rural villages to continue community development is investigated in Ota-district, which is affected by chuetu earthquake. Initially, Ota-district made the acting contents of the plan based on the village's request, which is considered resident life and problems in village. Next, Ota-district made the vision of plan based on the acting contents. This plan procedure has been effective to compliment the village community facilities and running on village event, in addition to setting the village's community to continue to manage community facilities and event. As a result, this way has helped good management of village event using the facilities and interchanging among residents. Also, the use of acting contents by request of the promotion council and village's community, while respecting both, has been effective in that the promotion council assists the village event after the rehabilitation community development plan is finished.

In less favored areas, it is getting more difficult to manage Satoyama according to aging of rural residents and depopulation. Some support of urban residents are necessary for management of Satoyama. In this paper, the role of Satoyama management activities was clarified through the analysis of the feature of activities for managing Satoyama. The questionnaire and interview surveys were done in order to clarify the actual conditions for management of Satoyama and activities of urban residents who are participating in NPO in Hyogo Prefecture. The results of analysis are as follows. (1)The form of rural-urban exchange in Satoyama is different in each Satoyama. (2)The urban residents are contributing to the region very much on both sides of the manager and the visitor in Satoyama. (3)Many urban residents visit Satoyama for the purpose of enjoying the variety of nature and culture programs in rural area. (4)There are some urban residents who participate in activities for managing Satoyama even if Satoyama is far from their residence. So it is important for rural residents to arrange the condition that they can visit rural area without difficulty.