The purpose of this study is to develop correction formulas using the results of measurement by PMS 103, which is a weight method measuring device, and by Dusttrak (TSI, USA), DustMate (Turnkey Instrument Ltd., UK), and LD-5 (SIBATA, Japan), which are light scattering measuring devices. The objective is to evaluate and identify new standards (to develop a proposal) in order to complement the limitations of the existing measurement methods of public transportation vehicle indoor air quality by utilizing the three nephelometer type measuring devices. In the case of non-rush hours, the PMS values were estimated using an estimation regression equation. Statistically, the PMS values that were actually measured were not significantly different (p-value=0.4375, 0.4375, 1.000). With respect to the agreement between the two values, ICC was 0.99 in the case of the estimation regression equation using LD-5 values, 0.97 in the case of the estimation regression equation using Dusttrak values, and 0.84 in the case of the estimation regression equation using DustMate values to allow for the identification of agreement at greater levels. In the case of rush hours, the PMS values were estimated using an estimation regression equation. Statistically, the PMS values that were actually measured were not significantly different (p-value=0.3125, 0.6250, 0.8125). With respect to the agreement between the two values, ICC was 0.92 in the case of the estimation regression equation using LD-5 values, 0.91 in the case of the estimation regression equation using Dusttrak values, and 0.89 in the case of the estimation regression equation using DustMate values to allow for the identification of agreement at greater levels.

The multiquadric terrain equation reproduces topography which is much closer to the real one than the digital terrain model. Also, terrain correction calculated by using the multiquadric terrain model shows a better result than that of digital terrain model. The accuracy of terrain correction depends on the accuracy of terrain data. Therefore, determination of the mean elevation of a terrain compartment by taking simple average of the maximum and minimum terrain height is not recommended. To obtain more accurate mean elevation of a compartment, a smaller scale topographic map such as 1:5,000 map is desirable for reading terrain data. But 1:25,000 map can be used for practical use. The pattern size of 250m×250m compartment is appeared to be suitable for near correction(D-F range), and 5㎞×5㎞ size for far correction. The computer program developed in this research can be used in all cases of surface and subsurface gravity surveys.