이 논문은 김억, 김영랑, 한흑구, 정인섭을 중심으로 식민지 조선 문인들의 “The lake isle of innisfree”의 수용과 전유 양상을 고찰하는 목적으로 한다. 식민지 조선 문단에서 “The lake isle of innisfree”는 ‘세계문학의 보편성’과 ‘식민지 문학의 특수성’을 지닌 예이츠의 대표시로 주목받으며 수용 주체의 문학 기획에 따라 다른 함의로 호명된다. 조선 문인들의 “The lake isle of innisfree”의 수용과 전유는 당대 이들이 기획했던 문학적 전략과 긴밀하게 연동되어 나타난다. 김억과 김영랑은 세계문학으로서 “The lake isle of innisfree”를 전유하면서 근대시로서 이 시의 특징에 주목한다. 이에 반해 한흑구와 정인섭은 식민지 문학으로서 “The lake isle of innisfree”를 전유 하며 이 시에 내포된 식민지적 정체성에 주목한다

For the proper preservation and utilisation of Regional Modern Heritage Buildings, it is necessary to study the history of local modern architecture based on a broad understanding of the region and also to architectural history. The aim of this study is expand the awareness and multi-faceted interpretation of modern architecture in Kwangju in the 1940’s to 1950’s, by exploring the origin of regional modern architecture from new perspectives. As a part of the discussions of the perspectives, this study will be therefore explained with the regional correlations between the architect Kim Han-seop’s works and activity, influential politicians, strong enthusiasm of education, architectural characteristics of the main building of Chosun University, architecture schools and association in Kwangju. Then, it will be finalised that Kim Han-seop and the main building of Chosun University are directly and indirectly correlated and affected each other strongly.

허영심은 청소년들이 어떤 사람으로 성장할 수 있는지 결정하는 중요한 요소이다. 이는 주로 청소년 기 교육 과정에서 허영심 자체가 위험하기 때문이다. 청소년기는 성인기에 접어드는 준비기이다. 이 시기의 교육이 제대로 이루어지지 못한다면 그들의 미래에 큰 영향을 미칠 수 있다. 칭찬과 인정받고 싶어함, 자신의 우월성 과시, 권력 추구 등은 청소년기의 특징이면서 곧 허영심의 표현 양상이다. 무조건적인 권력의 경쟁은 폭력과 비극을 초래한다. 청소년들 사이에서 일어나는 학교폭력은 바로 허영심의 결과물이다. 이런 문제를 피하고 청소년들을 건강한 성인으로 성장시키기 위해 본 연구는 소설을 활용한 청소년들의 허영심 치유 방안을 마련하고자 한다. 김성한의 ｢개구리｣는 개구리 세계의 우화를 통해 인간 사회의 비극을 보여준다. 독자들은 이 소설을 통해 권력욕망이 허영심을 유발 하는 원인이며, 허영심이 폭력과 비극을 초래한다는 사실을 알 수 있다. 또한 이 소설 중의 등장인물과 독자 자신을 비교함으로써 자아 성찰도 할 수 있다.

This note assesses the implications of the D.C. Circuit Court case of Han Kim v. Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, in which the court found the North Korean state responsible for the torture and unlawful killing of Kim Dong Shik, a South Korean missionary who was abducted by the North Korean government while in China. In particular, this note shows how the judgment breaks new ground by holding a state responsible for torture and unlawful killing based solely on general evidence of that country’s human rights practices, without additional information about the fate of the victim himself. This note also discusses this case’s implications for the plaintiffs themselves, and for other victims of North Korean human rights abuses.

Since Korean War, even though Kim Chai-choon, Han Gyung-Jik and Park Hyong-Ryong had manifested their anti-communism, their understanding for it was quite different one another. For, they have experienced the communism in the different situations. For Kim Chai-choon, he manifested himself as an anticommunist but he had a deideological understanding in his deep aspect. He criticized the dogmatism of communism, not but communism itself. Thus, Kim’s understanding for communism is considered as deideological one. The reason that he had deideological understanding was that he was influenced from Reinhold Niebuhr. In 1950’s, right after the end of the Korean War, he expressed the very vigorous view against the communism. However, it was because Song Chang-gun, his supporter as well as his friend, was kidnapped by North Korea. Meanwhile, Han was the strong view against the communism and he was an anticommunist. He imparted a “red dragon” to the communism, which was the religious meaning. Right after the independence, Han established the Christian Social-democratic Party in a bid for political activities. But his activities caused the conflicts with communists. So, he came to South Korea. After the Korean War, he worked as a senior pastor for Bethany Church(it became Young-Rak Church afterwards), which was consisted of many North Korean refugees. This was the main reason why he became a very vigorous anticommunist. Therefore, Han’s understanding for communism was called an “ideological understanding for communism based on personal experiences.” Park Hyong-ryong was also an anticommunist but not so much as Han. Because he had been working in South Korea right after Independence, he had no chance to have confliction with communists. He understood the communism as “God’s punishment against sinful people” and such an understanding was very normal at that time. However, in 1959, since third division of Presbyterian churches, he has had cold war ideological understanding. NAE, in which he played a central role and WCC, in which Han played a central role, crashed each other. At that time, Park accused Han of pro-communist and since then, he started understanding “New Theology” and “Communism” in the same category. Since then, Park has interchanged with Carl McIntyre, who was an anticommunist as well as an extreme right Christian leader. As a result, Park had the cold war ideological understanding against communism. Kim Chai-choon, Han Gyung-Jik and Park Hyong-Ryong experienced the Korean War and their experiences made themselves anticommunists but the reason that their views were quite different was that they had very different experiences.