For the release of the nuclear power plant site after the decommissioning, a reliable exposure dose assessment considering the environmental impact of residual radionuclides is essentially required. In this study, the Derived Concentration Guideline Level (DCGL) for the hypothetically contaminated surface soil at the Wolsong nuclear power plant (NPP) unit 1 site was preliminarily calculated by using the RESRAD-OFFSITE computational code and compared with the other case studies. Moreover, radiation exposure dose for local residents and relevant exposure pathways were quantitatively analyzed based on the calculation model established through this work. For the target site modeling, the source term was determined by referring to the previous case studies regarding the nuclear power plant decommissioning, quantification analysis data of pressure tubes of Wolsong NPP unit 1, and radionuclide data estimated by using the MCNP/ORIGEN-2 code. In total, 14 different radioisotopes such as Ag-108m, C-14, Co-60, Cs-134/137, Fe-55, H-3, Nb-93m/94, Ni-63, Sb-125, Sn-121m, Sr-90, and Zr-93 were considered as target radionuclides. In addition, the geological structure model of the Wolsong NPP site was established based on the final safety analysis report of Wolsong NPP unit 1. The distribution coefficients (Kd) were taken from the JAEA-SDB to estimate the migration/retardation behavior of various radionuclides under the groundwater condition of the Wolsong NPP site. In the present work, the DCGL values were calculated according to the site release criterion of 0.1 mSv/yr, which indicates the radiation protection standard for the site release. Moreover, the exposure pathway and sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the sensitive input parameters remarkably influencing the calculation result. For the evaluation of exposure dose for local residents, a site layout centered around Wolsong NPP unit 4, located in the closest proximity to the residents’ habitation area, was alternatively established and all potential exposure pathways were considered as a comprehensive resident farmer scenario. The results obtained from this study are expected to serve as a preliminary case study for the DCGL values regarding the surface soil at the Wolsong NPP unit 1 site and for evaluating the radiation exposure dose to local residents resulting from the residual radioactivity at the site after the decommissioning.

RUCAS (Recycling-Underlying Computational Dose Assessment System), a dose assessment program based on the RESRAD-RECYCLE framework, is designed to evaluate dose for recycling scenarios of radioactive waste in metals and concrete. To confirm the validity of the recycling scenarios provided by RUCAS, comparative evaluations will be conducted with RESRAD-RECYCLE for metal radioactive waste recycling scenarios and with MicroShield® for concrete radioactive waste recycling scenarios. In the evaluation of metal recycling scenarios without shielding, RUCAS showed similar results when compared to both MicroShield® and RESRAD-RECYCLE. This validates the function of dose assessments using RUCAS for metal recycling scenarios. However, when shielding was present, RUCAS produced results that were comparable to MicroShield®, but differed from those of RESRAD-RECYCLE. The underestimation of dose values up to 1.66E+08 times difference by RESRAD-RECYCLE could potentially decrease reliability and safety in evaluated doses, further emphasizing the importance of RUCAS. Because validation is also necessary for the expanded calculation capabilities resulting from methodological changes of RUCAS (i.e., various radiation source geometries), based on prior validations, it was determined that additional validations are required for different radiation source materials and shielding conditions. In case where the radiation source and shielding materials were identical, RUCAS and MicroShield® produced similar results according to both the Kalos et al. (1974) and Lin and Jiang (1996) methodologies. This demonstrates that the that differences in methodology are inconsequential when considering the same source and shielding materials. However, when the atomic number of the radiation source materials was larger than that of shielding material (HZ-LZ condition), RUCAS obtained results similar to MicroShield® only for the Kalos et al. (1974) methodology. While Lin and Jiang (1996) methodology yield higher results than MicroShield®. Lastly, in case where the atomic number of the radiation source material was smaller than that of the shielding material (LZ-HZ condition,) both methodologies yielded results comparable to MicroShield®. In conclusion, the validity of RUCAS’s shielding calculations has been verified, confirming improvements in dose assessment compared to RESRAD-RECYCLE. Additionally, we observed that shielding effectiveness calculations differ depending on the methodology of build-up effect. If the validity of these methodologies is confirmed, it is expected that selecting the most advantageous methodology for each condition will enable more rational dose assessments. Consequently, in future research, we plan to evaluate the validity of Lin and Jiang (1996) methodology using particle transport codes based on the Monte Carlo method, such as MCNP and Geant 4, rather than MicroShield®.

Radiological impact analyses were carried out for a near-surface radioactive waste repository at Gyeongju in South Korea. The RESRAD-ONSITE code was applied for the estimation of maximum exposure doses by considering various exposure pathways based on a land area of 2,500 m2 with a 0.15 m thick contamination zone. Typical influencing input parameters such as shield depth, shield materials’ density, and shield erosion rate were examined for a sensitivity analysis. Then both residential farmer and industrial worker scenarios were used for the estimation of maximum exposure doses depending on exposure duration. The radiation dose evaluation results showed that 60Co, 137Cs, and 63Ni were major contributors to the total exposure dose compared with other radionuclides. Furthermore, the total exposure dose from ingestion (plant, meat, and milk) of the contaminated plants was more significant than those assessed for inhalation, with maximum values of 5.5×10−4 mSv‧yr−1 for the plant ingestion. Thus the results of this study can be applied for determining near-surface radioactive waste repository conditions and providing quantitative analysis methods using RESRAD-ONSITE code for the safety assessment of disposing radioactive materials including decommissioning wastes to protect human health and the environment.

중·저준위방사성폐기물 표층처분시설 인간침입시나리오의 ‘평가/해석에 대한 불확실성’의 관리를 위해 GENII를 이용 한 평가결과를 오염토양에 대한 방사선영향평가를 위해 개발된 RESRAD를 이용하여 검증하였다. 중저준위방사성폐기물 표 층처분시설의 인간침입시나리오로 시추후거주시나리오를 선정하여 각 코드의 현상 모사에서 발생하는 한계점을 파악하고 동일한 입력데이터 조건에서 두 코드의 평가결과를 비교분석함으로써 모델링의 불확실성을 분석하였다. 평가결과 각 코드 에서 일부 핵종의 거동모사에 대한 차이는 있었으나 폐쇄후관리기간 이후 선량평가 결과 모든 피폭경로에 대한 경향이 유사 함을 확인하였다. 또한 RESRAD에서 확인한 선량평가 결과를 바탕으로 입력인자에 대한 민감도 분석을 수행하고 주요입력 인자를 도출하였다. 이를 통해 모델링 결과 및 입력인자에 대한 불확실성을 분석하고 안전성평가 결과에 대한 신뢰성을 확 인하였다. 본 연구의 결과는 중저준위방사성폐기물 처분시설의 Safety Case 구축에 활용될 수 있다.

원자력발전소 해체 시 발생하는 금속폐기물은 폐기물 중에서 많은 비중을 차지하고 있다. 본 연구에서는 국내 자체처분 규제 요건 및 국내 기관별 자체처분현황을 조사하였다. 실제 원자력발전소 해체 시 발생되는 금속폐기물의 자체처분을 위하여 RESRAD-RECYCLE 코드를 이용하였으며 26가지 시나리오에 대한 선량평가를 수행하였다. 평가결과는 원자력발전소 해 체 시 자체처분 및 재활용에 관한 사전자료로서 활용가치가 있을 것으로 사료된다. 추후 자체처분을 통한 처분비용 저감효 과 연구가 추가로 가능할 것으로 판단된다.