본 연구는 유아의 인성리더십 교육에서 교사의 상호작용 역량강화를 위한 교사 훈련 프로그 램을 개발하고 효과를 분석하는 것에 목적이 있다. 연구의 목적을 달성하기 위하여 설정한 연 구문제는 두 가지이다. 첫째, 유아 인성리더십 교육에서 교사의 상호작용 역량강화를 위한 훈 련 프로그램을 개발하는 것으로 도구 개발과 훈련체계 구성이 포함된다. 둘째, 개발된 교사 훈련 프로그램의 효과를 분석하는 것으로, 황금원 모델에 대한 지필테스트 결과의 분석, TTCS(TREASURE Talk Coding System)를 통한 동료코칭 피드백 분석, CICAIO(Coaching Inventory Child-Adult Interaction Through Observation)를 통한 상호작용 훈련 효과의 분석 이 포함된다. 연구 결과, 황금원 모델에 따른 구인별 음원 24개, 스탬프로 제작된 습관별 코칭 놀이감 8개, 구인별 음원과 코칭 놀이감을 활용한 코칭 스크립트 24개, 모듈별 코칭 동영상 3개, 8시간의 교사 훈련 체계를 포함한 교사 훈련 프로그램이 개발되었다. 또 황금원 모델에 대한 지필 테스 트, TTCS(TREASURE Talk Coding System)를 통한 동료코칭 피드백 분석, CICAIO(Coaching Inventory Child-Adult Interaction Through Observation)를 통한 상호작 용 훈련 효과의 분석을 통해 프로그램의 효과를 분석한 결과, 실험집단 유아 교사에게 유의미 한 효과가 있음이 확인되었다.

The present study aims to compare teacher talk and the course book used as a source of vocabulary input. For the research purpose, part of Yenny Corpus (Kwon, 2013) was used to analyze the vocabulary content of the two input sources. Yenny Corpus consists of a total of 247,398 words collected from EFL classes of four native and five non-native university lecturers. In this study, however, the data of 1,416 words by the native teachers and 1,651 words by the non-native teachers with their course book scripts were used. To analyze the quantity and quality of the vocabulary use (e.g., level, diversity) of the two input sources, some representative word lists such as BNC-COCA 25,000 word family list topped on Range Program (Heatley & Nation, 2002) were applied. The results show that the teachers (including both native and non-native teachers) orally provide 8,090 word types while their course books introduce 4,713. The non-native teachers provide a little more vocabulary input compared with the native teachers’ talk. In addition, the level of the vocabulary provided by the non-native teachers seems more appropriate for their students’ vocabulary ability. Nevertheless, in order to generalize the findings further research is needed in different settings.

The purpose of the study is to compare the nature of teacher talk between the native and non-native speaking professors with its focus on language functions and interaction modifications in English-mediated writing instruction. The study analyzed the classroom languages of two professors who were teaching college-level composition courses using the same textbook and syllabus. The classes taught by the two professors were videotaped, transcribed, and analyzed based on the AS-unit. The results showed both professors used all of the five functions in the order of information, suasion, opinion, future plans, and checking. The NS professor, on the other hand, used the information function more often, while the NNS professor relied more on the suasion function. The data also displayed that the NS professor gave more feedback responses, whereas the NNS professor asked more clarification requests and repeated their own utterances. The findings implied that the types and distribution of the teacher talk may be influenced by the subject-matter and the instructional foci of each professor.

It's long been noted that a serious discrepancy exists between elementary school English classes and middle school English classes. This study explores the differences in the teacher talks of elementary and middle school classrooms. To this end, three elementary school English classes and three middle school English classes are tape-recorded, and their teacher utterances are analyzed according to forms of utterances, functions of utterances and language types. The result shows that elementary school English teachers use significantly more command forms and feedback than middle school English teachers while they use significantly more non-class related utterances more than elementary school teachers. They utter class-related managerial and disciplinary categories significantly more than middle school English teachers while they do miscellaneous categories significantly more than elementary school teachers. In terms of languages teachers use in the classroom, elementary school teachers speaks English significantly more than middle school English teachers. Elementary school teachers tend to use plain Korean to individual students while using formal Korean to the whole class. Middle school teachers tend to use formal Korean irrespective of whole group, small group and individual students.

본 연구에서는 교사말에서 나타나는 메타언어적 기능의 실제 수행이 어떻게 이루어지는지 살펴보았다. 한국어교실에서 교사는 수업 도중 대상어를 통해 언어적 정보를 제공하는데, 이 대상어를 통해서 교사가 메타언어적 기능을 어떻게 구체적으로 제공하는지 실제 예를 통해서 살펴보았다. 대상어를 기준으로 어떤 정보를 제공하느냐에 따라 대상어의 발음 정보 제공 기능, 대상어의 문법 정보 제공 기능, 대상어의 의미 정보 제공으로 범주를 나눌 수 있다. 그 결과, 대상어의 의미 정보 제공 기능에서는 의미 단순 제공, 제3 언어로 제공, 경험 상기, 확인, 문법 용어 제공, 결합 정보, 사용 맥락, 다른 의미의 예 등이 수행되는 것을 확인 할 수 있었다. 본 연구는 한국어 교사의 실제 발화 자료를 통해 메타언어적 기능을 분석했다는 점에서 의의를 가진다고 볼 수 있다.

ThÎs article presents an initial frarnework for analyzing teacher responses. The analysis attempts to illuminate the support to the idea that leaming is an interactive process. From this Vygotskian viewpoint, teacher talk is a channel by which leamers participate in a leaming process so that the learning process can be appropriated. An analysis has been done with a middle-school classroom talk. A video-taped 7 minute episode showed that the teacher-leamer conversations lack in the function of co-constructing. A modified episode is presented to illustrate a more interactive and elaborate teacher talk.