In the court case of Jun 29 2017 ruling 2017Do3808, Supreme Court ruled that breaking the duty of returning or discarding trade secrets after resignation by revealing trade secrets to competitors or keeping it for own interest is enough to establish post-resignation professional misappropriation. And Supreme Court decided ruled that one cannot be a subject of professional misappropriation after 1year of resignation unless ‘special consideration’ is needed. Therefore, the accused, who created a program based on company’s particular file, cannot be a subject of additional professional misappropriation since the action of the accused was based on already-established professional misappropriation. Furthermore, the Supreme Court ruled that the accused complicit cannot be a complicit of the professional misappropriation since the action of accused complicit is based on already-established professional misappropriation as well. Therefore, the Supreme Court returned the case to the lower court. Based on this case, there is question regarding the relationship between perpetrated time of professional misappropriation and the status of being in charge of the transaction of others’ business after resignation. There is also a question regarding the level of execution based on the speciality of professional misappropriation. This case study is done based on those questions. Then this case study did the reviewed the relationship between the intention of misappropriation and intention of unlawful gains that needs to be proved in order to establish professional misappropriation crimes. The Supreme Court’s ruling that the accused is a subject of already-established professional misappropriation due to nonperformance of returning or discarding trade secrets is problematic. It is problematic for following reasons: First, it ruled out the possibility of accusing the complicit by deciding the perpetrated time as the period of resignation. Second, it contains the possibility of turning the characteristic of misappropriation from offense provoking specific danger to abstract endangerment offenses.

본 연구에서는 파트린드 저수지의 유입부에서 댐 구조물까지 대상구간으로 설정하고 상류유입 유량, 유사 및 수문 운영에 따른 장기 퇴적양상을 EFDC 모형을 이용하여 5년에 걸쳐 모의하고 배사문 운영을 통한 배사효과에 대하여 모의하였다. 배사문 운영결과 배사시 수로를 형성하여 주로 수로를 따라서 활발히 발생하는 것으로 나타났으며 이는 기존 저수지 배사의 물리적인 특성을 잘 반영하는 것으로 판단된다. EFDC 모형의 모의결과로부터 취수구 전단부에서의 입도분포와 특정입경의 유사도달 여부 등 다양한 정보를 얻을 수 있었으며 향후 저수지 운영에 기초자료로 활용할 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.