논문 상세보기

품질의 이원론을 이용한 개선의 우선순위 결정 KCI 등재

Determination of Priority for Improvement Using the Theory of Two-dimensional Quality

  • 언어KOR
  • URLhttps://db.koreascholar.com/Article/Detail/240968
구독 기관 인증 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다. 4,000원
한국산업경영시스템학회지 (Journal of Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering)
한국산업경영시스템학회 (Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering)
초록

The theory of two-dimensional quality, in particular, the Kano model that is developed by the analogy with the M-H theory, has been applied in various industry fields for more than three decades. Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA) assumes that the degree of physical fulfilment of quality attributes and the satisfaction of that attribute is linear, and therefore, it is applicable to the traditional one-dimensional attribute, not other quality types defined in the Kano’s model such as attractive or must-be attribute. To solve this problem, the current study suggests a new importance-satisfaction analysis using a modified IPA in accordance with the three quality types and a diagonal method introduced by Slack (1999) to determine improvement priority. For this, I investigated 19 smartphone’s quality attributes and conducted a survey of 334 university students for the results of Kano’s model, which adopted from Song and Park (2012)’s study, and the importance/satisfaction of the quality attributes and the results of the priority for improvement of the 19 quality attributes. The results show that the proposed I-S priority model is better than the conventional IPA based on the comparison results of determination coefficient from the regression analysis of the two models.

저자
  • 송해근(성균관대학교 시스템경영공학과) | Hae Geun Song Corresponding Author