논문 상세보기

조사자 증언 관련 특신상태의 판단과 증명 KCI 등재

Judgment and verification of special guarantees of trustworthiness in police officer’s testifying in court

  • 언어KOR
  • URLhttps://db.koreascholar.com/Article/Detail/278599
서비스가 종료되어 열람이 제한될 수 있습니다.
刑事判例硏究 (형사판례연구)
한국형사판례연구회 (Korean Association of Criminal Case Studies)
초록

I think the spirit of the introduction of the testimony system of investigators, is in order to prevent, it is possible, among other things, what happens to overturn sentence unfair of witness or defendant, the absurd result, to deal effectively with this. If you look at the relevant case law of the testimony system after the introduction of the investigators, the main material used to determine the presence or absence of special guarantees of trustworthiness associated with the testimony of investigators. If there is participants at the time, it is possible to mention his statement, a description of statement was created in the course of the investigation. Therefore, in order to be recognized innocuously the special guarantees of trustworthiness from the perspective of law enforcement, it or enlist a person or trusted counsel in the course of the investigation, to record the all process of investigation is most preferred and counsel or if the video recording research and participation of people with a trust relationship has not been made, and that along with the testimony itself of investigators, will be discussed in a comprehensive manner, such as the description of the written statement and assertion of the accused, the presence or absence of special guarantees of trustworthiness, it is necessary to judge. And, by notifying explicitly whether the certification of special guarantees of trustworthiness associated with the testimony of the investigator in the course of the trial, so as to additional proof activities for inspection, by this, the court, a sufficient psychological it is necessary while securing the article must determine the adoption of evidence.

목차
[대상판결] 춘천지방법원 2013. 8. 27. 선고 2013고합54 판결
  [공소사실]
  [판결 이유]
 [연 구]
  I. 시작하는 말
   1. 수사 및 재판의 진행 경과
   2. 대상판결의 쟁점
   3. 문제의 제기
  Ⅱ. 조사자 증언과 특신상태 판단
   1. 조사자 증언제도 개관
   2. 특신상태 관련 판례
   3. 특신상태의 판단방법
   4. 대상판결 사안의 검토
  Ⅲ. 조사자 증언과 특신상태 증명
   1. 일반적인 증거조사절차 개관
   2. 특신상태의 증거조사
   3. 대상판결 사안의 검토
  Ⅳ. 맺 는 말
  [참고문헌]
  [Abstract]
저자
  • 한제희(대검찰청 검찰연구관) | Je-Hee HAN