With the rapid change of rural communities and increasing desire for social welfare, the demand for the quality of public spaces and facilities is increasing. However, inefficient location of rural public space and facility has caused problems such as economic inefficiency, inconvenient accessibility, environmental pollution, unsustainable energy use, and disturbance of visual landscape. This study aims to evaluate suitability of public spaces and facilities in three types of rural village: rural downtown village, rural clustered village, and individual village. As a way to measure the suitability of public spaces and facilities, we assessed indicators of suitability in terms of accessibility, usability, biophysical environment, and sustainable management. To evaluate the accessibility, we applied indicators such as distance from residential areas, public transit, market and public facilities. For the evaluation of biophysical environment, we applied indicators such as slope, elevation, aspect, and occurrence of natural disasters. We analyzed digital maps representing the indicators listed above using GIS. We also conducted a survey and face-to-face interviews to evaluate usability and sustainability of management which are not possible to understand through maps. As a result, we identified that suitability of public spaces and facilities in downtown villages is higher than clustered and individual villages. In particular, suitability of infrastructure facilities, social welfare facilities, and income generation facilities in downtown village are higher than those in clustered and individual villages. The suitability of tourism facilities is generally lower than other types of public facility across the three types of villages. Tourism facilities in clustered village have been identified especially unsuitable compared to other types of villages. We expect the outcome of the research is helpful to improve allocation of public spaces and facilities in rural villages.

I. 서 론
 1. 연구의 개요
 II. 연구의 이론적 배경
  1. 농촌 공공공간 및 시설유형
  2. 농촌마을 유형분류
 III. 연구의 범위 및 방법
  1. 연구의 범위
  2. 연구의 방법
 IV. 대상지 환경 분석
  1. 대상지 평가지표 설정 및 GIS 자료 분석
  2. 대상지 시설현황 및 이용실태 현장분석
 V. 연구결과 및 고찰
  1. 연구결과
  2. 종합고찰
 VI. 결론 및 시사점
 References

• 서주환(경희대학교 예술디자인대학 환경조경디자인학과) | Suh Joo-Hwan
• 김진오(경희대학교 예술디자인대학 환경조경디자인학과) | Kim Jin-Oh Corresponding author
• 송병화(경희대학교 일반대학원 조경학 전공) | Song Byeong-Hwa