논문 상세보기

개선된 명시적 방법과 예측수정 α-Method방법의 비교 KCI 등재

Comparison of Improved Explicit Method and Predictor Correct α-Method

  • 언어ENG
  • URLhttps://db.koreascholar.com/Article/Detail/312603
구독 기관 인증 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다. 4,000원
복합신소재구조학회 논문집 (Journal of the Korean Society for Advanced Composite Structures)
한국복합신소재구조학회 (Korean Society for Advanced Composite Structures)
초록

Dynamic application lower mode response is of interest, however the higher modes of spatially discretized equations generally do not represent the real behavior. Some implicit algorithms, therefore, are introduced to filter out the high-frequency modes. The objective of this study is to introduce the P-method and PC α-method to compare that with dissipation method and Newmark method through the stability analysis and numerical example. PC α-method gives more accuracy than other methods because it based on the α-method inherits the superior properties of the implicit α -method. In finite element analysis, the PC α-method is more useful than other methods because it is the explicit scheme and it achieve the second order accuracy and numerical damping simultaneously.

저자
  • Kwon, Min-Ho(Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, ERI, Gyeongsang National University) | 권민호
  • Jung, Woo-Young(Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Gangneung-Wonju National University) | 정우영 Corresponding author