Targeting people returning to farming and also people preparing for returning to farming, this study analyzed differences in awareness of conflict factors and conflict management focusing on the conflicts experiencing in the process of their movement and settlement process in rural area. In the results, people preparing for returning to farming showed higher awareness of conflicts and also higher necessity of conflict management than people already returning to farming. Also, both groups preferred individual conflict management to structural conflict management. Based on the results like above, the implications can be summarized like below. First, it would be necessary to have programs informing possible conflicts in advance in the process of returning to farming and also relieving psychological anxiety by providing prior-learning to people preparing for returning to farming. Second, it would be necessary to have individual conflict management measures to establish mutual trust and to form community spirit through regular social gatherings between original residents and people returning to farming. Since the effect of conflict management can be maximized only when the structural and individual conflict managements are properly harmonized, it would be necessary to have the structural conflict management which is relatively felt difficult.

I. 서 론
 II. 이론적 고찰
  1. 귀농·귀촌 갈등 요인에 대한 이해
  2. 귀농·귀촌 갈등관리에 대한 이해
  3. 귀농·귀촌 경험 여부
 III. 연구방법
  1. 연구모형 및 연구가설 선정
  2. 조사설계 및 분석방법
 V. 연구결과
  1. 설문응답자 특성
  2. 가설검증을 위한 신뢰도 및 요인분석
  3. 귀농․귀촌 경험여부에 따른 집단 간 인식차이
  4. 갈등주체와 갈등 조정 및 해결주체에 대한 인식차이
 V. 결 론
 References

• 이성일(대전발전연구원 도시안전디자인센터) | Lee Seong-il
• 안민지(서울시립대학교 일반대학원 조경학과) | Ahn, Min-ji
• 김용근(서울시립대학교 조경학과) | Kim Yong-geun Corresponding author