논문 상세보기

Effect of a short-term in vitro exposure time on the production of in vitro produced piglets KCI 등재

  • 언어ENG
  • URLhttps://db.koreascholar.com/Article/Detail/316152
  • DOIhttps://doi.org/10.12750/JET.2016.31.2.117
구독 기관 인증 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다. 4,000원
한국동물생명공학회지 (구 한국수정란이식학회지) (Journal of Animal Reproduciton and Biotechnology)
한국동물생명공학회(구 한국수정란이식학회) (Journal of Animal Reproduction & Biotechnology)
초록

Although piglets have been delivered by embryo transfer (ET) with in vitro produced (IVP) embryos and blastocysts, a success rate has still remained lower level. Unlike mouse, human, and bovine, it is difficult to a production of piglets by in vitro fertilization (IVF) because of an inappropriate in vitro culture (IVC) system in pig. Therefore, the present study was conducted to investigate whether minimized exposure time in IVC can improve the pregnancy and delivery rates of piglets. Immediately after IVM, the oocytes were denuded and co-incubated with freshly ejaculated boar semen for 3.5 to 4 hours at 38.5 ˚C under 5% CO2 in air. To avoid long-term exposure to in vitro state, we emitted IVC step after IVF. After that the presumptive zygotes were transferred into both oviducts of the surrogate on the same day or 1 day after the onset of estrus. Pregnancy was diagnosed on day 28 after ET and then was checked regularly every month by ultrasound examination. The 3 out of 4 surrogates were determined as pregnant (75%) and a total of 5 piglets (2 females and 3 males) were delivered at 118.3 ± 2.5 days of pregnancy period. In conclusion, a short-term exposure time may be an important factor in the production of IVP-derived piglets. It can be apply to the in vitro production system of transgenic pig by IVF, cloning, and pronuclear microinjection methods.

목차
INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
  1. General information
  2. In vitro maturation
  3. In vitro fertilization
  4. Embryo transfer and delivery
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
저자
  • In-Sul Hwang(Animal Biotechnology Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration)
  • Dae-Jin Kwon(Animal Biotechnology Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration)
  • Tae-Uk Kwak(Animal Biotechnology Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration)
  • Joo-Young Lee(Animal Biotechnology Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration)
  • Nam-Woong Hyung(Animal Biotechnology Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration)
  • Hyeon Yang(Animal Biotechnology Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration)
  • Keon Bong Oh(Animal Biotechnology Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration)
  • Sun-A Ock(Animal Biotechnology Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration)
  • Eung-Woo Park(Animal Genetics and Bioinformatics Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration)
  • Gi-Sun Im(Animal Biotechnology Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration)
  • Seongsoo Hwang(Animal Biotechnology Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration)