This study examined how ‘forest name’ and ‘information on forest healing effectiveness’ influence users’ perceived restorativeness (PR). The study area was ‘Forest Healing Road’ in Mudeungsan National Park. Data were collected from 359 Gwang-ju citizens selected by convenient and snowball sampling procedures using some simulated photographs and questionnaire during May-June, 2015. The placebo treatment group generally showed more positive ratings on PR than control groups. While the groups exposed to good environmental conditions didn’t show any differences on PR between placebo and control groups, the groups exposed to medium or bad environmental conditions showed differences on PR. Placebo effects on PR were influenced by socio-demographic backgrounds (e.g., gender, age, education level), knowledge about healing forest, and environmental condition of healing forest. Some research and managerial implications were suggested.

Ⅰ. 서론
 Ⅱ. 연구방법
  1. 연구대상지역
  2. 조사대상자 및 표집
  3. 자료수집 방법 및 절차
  4. 변수측정
 Ⅲ. 결과 및 고찰
  1. 응답자의 인구사회학적 특성 및 치유의 숲에 대한 지식수준
  2. 컨트롤과 플라시보 그룹 간 회복환경지각(PR) 비교
  3. 인구사회학적 배경 및 치유의 숲에 대한 인식여부 변수 통제 후 컨트롤과 플라시보 그룹 간 PR 비교
 Ⅳ. 적요
 Ⅴ. References

• 김상미(전남대학교 농업생명과학대학 임학과) | Sang Mi Kim
• 최솔아(전남대학교 농업생명과학대학 임학과) | Sol Ah Choi
• 김상오(전남대학교 농업생명과학대학 임학과) | Sang Oh Kim Corresponding author