논문 상세보기

Estrus synchronization affects galectin-3, FGF-9 signaling in the sow reproductive tract

Baek S. Y, Kim D. W, Min Y. J, Cho E. S, Choi T. J, Soh H. C, Kim Y. M, Kang S. J, Kim B. K, Cho K. H, Cho K. H1
  • 언어ENG
  • URLhttps://db.koreascholar.com/Article/Detail/325041
모든 회원에게 무료로 제공됩니다.
한국동물생명공학회(구 한국수정란이식학회) (Journal of Animal Reproduction & Biotechnology)
초록

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of estrus synchronization to altrenogest regumate (progesterone), PMSG/hCG, and artificial insemination (AI) on galectin-3, FGF-9 gene and protein expression. The morpho-metrical parameters of the endometrium and the number of corpora lutea (CL) were recorded. RNA was isolated from endometrial, oviduct and ovary tissues of non-synchronized (Control; n = 7) and AI synchronized (regumate, PMSG/hCG; n = 7) sows. The total number of CL was higher (P<0.05) in pigs treated with regumate/PMSG/hCG. The content of gelactin-3 and FGF-9 mRNA in pre-embryonic development stages increased on particular days, in control and studied in regumate/PMSG/hCG administered pigs. Gelactin-3 and FGF-9 were affected by regumate/PMSG/hCG treatment in the both pre-embryonic development stages (P<0.001, P<0.05) and encdometrial tissue (P<0.001, P<0.01). The regumate/PMSG/hCG treatment resulted in elevated expression of gelactin-3 (P<0.001) and FGF-9 (P<0.005) in oviduct and ovary tissues in comparison to control sows. Moreover, oviduct amount of gelectin-3 mRNA was higher in regumate/PMSG/hCG sows in comparison to the control group (P<0.05), whereas, expression characteristics of gelactin-3 and FGF-9 were investigated by hematoxylin and eosin stained and immunohistochemical staining. The results showed that galectin-3 and FGF-9 were significantly shown in the endometrium, oviduct and ovary tissues of the regumate/PMSG/ hCG. Presented data show that exogenous hormones administration can affect gene and protein expression in the sow reproductive tract.

저자
  • Baek S. Y(Swine Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science)
  • Kim D. W(Swine Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science)
  • Min Y. J(Swine Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science)
  • Cho E. S(Swine Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science)
  • Choi T. J(Swine Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science)
  • Soh H. C(Swine Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science)
  • Kim Y. M(Swine Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science)
  • Kang S. J(Swine Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science)
  • Kim B. K(Department of Animal Resources Science, Kongju National University)
  • Cho K. H(Swine Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science)
  • Cho K. H1(Swine Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science)