논문 상세보기

Literary Reception of a Historical Fact and the Matter of the State and Nation - The Wanpaoshan Incident and Literary Response of Korean, Chinese and Japanese Writers KCI 등재

  • 언어ENG
  • URLhttps://db.koreascholar.com/Article/Detail/330320
서비스가 종료되어 열람이 제한될 수 있습니다.
통일인문학 (S/N Korean Humanities)
건국대학교 인문학연구원 (The Institute of the Humanities for Unification)
초록

The Wanpaoshan Incident that took place in 1931 and the tragic Anti-Chinese Riots that ensued in Korea had great repercussions in the three countries of East Asia. Writers in Korea, China and Japan fictionalized these events concurrently or a few years after the incident. In the other of publication, the novelette Manpozan (October 1931) by Ito Einesuke, a Japanese writer, the novel Wanpaoshan (March 1933) by Li Huiying of China, the novelette “Farmer” (July 1939) by Yi T’ae-Chun of Korea, novella Rice Plant (1941) by An Su-Kil of Korea and the novel Reclamation (1943) by Chang Hyŏk-Chu of Korea were major examples. This article, using four novels – Ito Einosuke’s Manpozan, Li Huiying’s Wanpaoshan, Yi T’ae-Chun’s “Farmer”, and An Su-Kil’s Rice Plant – as main texts, analyzed the ways in which writers from Korea, Japan and China fictionalized the Wanpaoshan Incident. The four novels dealing with the Wanpaoshan Incident were all written from different perspectives and thus the emphases were different as well. The writers responded differently, and we will show how the writer’s national identity, ideology, and the existence of experience and its depth were articulated in the fictionalization process of a literary work.

저자
  • Ren Qiule(Ocean University of China)
  • Li Haiying(Ocean University of China)