The aim of this study on analysis of curriculum of high school Earth Science is; 1) To investigate whether experiment and observation unit are properly organized. 2) To provide useful materials for reorganization of Earth Science curriculum in future. 3) To suggest that the curriculum be operated properly in the era of 2000s. This study reaches the conclusions which are as follows; 1) After classifying the course of experiment and observation, we have found it difficult to help the students inquiry learning for they are organized only to be explained by teacher on the purpose of passing entrance exam. 2) It is difficult to help students make an experiment because of laboratory's lack. So it is necessary for the education authority to require the situation and to support its system actively. 3) Lack of experimental equipments and classroom schedule for experiment make it difficult to make an experiment in most schools(For example 89.1 % of the whole school lack implement, 52.7% lack prepared hours, 73.6% perform less than 5 hours a week). 4) It is not proper to divide the curriculum into Earth Science(I) and Earth Science(II). Most of teachers tell that the teaching material is somewhat difficult for the students to understand and the quantity of those is too much(80.9%). 5) Those who study liberal course are inclined to choose Biology(82.7%) and those who study natural science, Chemistry(76.4%) or Biology(79.1). In most high school they are forced to run curriculum unfairly on account of this present condition.

• 송희석