논문 상세보기
pp.147-156
PURPOSES: The purpose of this study is to analyze the characteristics of the weight values of evaluation items by traffic safety project type.
METHODS: In general, a large-scale investment in projects such as the traffic safety project requires economic analyses to be performed in advance. However, there is an argument for considering special characteristics of the traffic safety project. Therefore, this study conducted characteristic analysis of the weight values of evaluation items. The analysis consisted of two steps. The first step was hypothesis verification using analysis of variance (ANOVA). In this process, the authors examined whether the weight of evaluation items is the same regardless of the traffic safety project type. Based on the first step's results, the authors proceeded to the second step. The objective of this step was to analyze how different the weight values are by traffic safety project type using an analytic hierarchy process.
RESULTS: According to the ANOVA test results, the benefit to cost ratios have different weight values based on traffic safety project type at the 0.01 significance level. The policy evaluation items, such as the plans connection, resident opinion, and regional equity, also showed the same results except that the result for the related plans connection was statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Based on the first step's result, the AHP analysis in the second step showed that the traffic safety projects for vulnerable users and pedestrians have very low weight values in economic evaluation factors compared with other safety project types. The weight values for vulnerable users and pedestrians were 0.29 and 0.26, respectively, in economic evaluation items. On the other hand, the weight values for other safety project types were around 0.6. Among the policy evaluation items, resident opinion showed a higher weight value than other factors, such as connection and regional equity items.
CONCLUSIONS: The social and economic impact of a traffic safety project varies by project type and project characteristics. Although the economic approach is overarching and a reasonable methodology is applied for large-scale projects, it should be noted that the safety issue, especially for transportation of vulnerable uses, requires a non-economical approach. Based on the analysis results, this study suggests that the priority of the projects should be determined by separating them into independent assessment groups depending on their characteristics.
1. 서론
1.1. 연구의 배경 및 목적
1.2. 연구방법
2. 이론 및 선행연구 고찰
2.1. 이론적 고찰
2.2. 선행연구 고찰
2.3. 기존연구의 한계와 본 연구의 차별성
3. 연구 방법론
3.1. 평가대상 교통안전사업의 범위
3.2. 평가항목 및 계층구조 설정
3.3. 전문가 구성 및 설문조사
4. 분석결과
4.1. 분산분석 결과
4.2. AHP 분석결과
5. 교통안전사업 유형별 가중치 특성분석
5.1. 경제적 평가요소의 중요도 차이
5.2. 정책적 평가요소의 중요도 차이
6. 결론 및 향후연구
6.1. 연구의 결론
6.2. 향후연구
REFERENCES
