Purpose - The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) among 16 countries including South Korea, the largest free trade agreement in the Asia-Pacific region, will be concluded next year. The participating countries decided to pursue a comprehensive and high –quality agreement, while ensuring flexibility considering development level of each country. In this study, trade structures between nations from 2005 through 2016 were examined to see the impact that this agreement will have on Korea and to come up with effective countermeasures. Research design, data, and methodology - The method of analysis includes the analysis of the trade matrix, which is useful for identifying the dependency of the individual countries on the market in the region and the reciprocal dependency of the member countries on the market, and the index of intensity of trade, which is useful for figuring out the share of trade between the parties in total trade. Results - The results showed that first, the international trade coefficients of Vietnam and Philippines are higher than those of China and Japan. Secondly, the international inducement coefficients between China and Japan were high, and that between Indonesia and Burma were low, indicating that Korea's exports did not have much effect on export increase of these countries. Third, as a result of analyzing Korea's trade intensity, it was found that export intensity and import intensity were greater than 1 in Vietnam and Philippines, which shows that there is a high degree of relational bond with these countries. India and Laos countries still have a low level of relational bond, which indicates that there is room for improvement in economic relations when the agreement is concluded. After the signing of the agreement in the future, more diverse industrial structures should be continuously studied.
Conclusions - The analysis of trade matrix, trade structure, trade inducement coefficient and trade intensity between Korea and RCEP participating countries shows that the majority of the countries have the high level of economic relationship with Korea. Korea should drive a harder bargain when negotiating the terms of the RCEP, in comparison with the level of the existing FTA agreement excluding Japan.

Abstract
 1. 서론
 2. 이론적 배경
  2.1. RCEP 현황 및 쟁점사항
  2.2. 선행연구 고찰
 3. 연구 방법론
  3.1. 분석 방법
  3.2. 연구 모형
 4. 연구 결과
  4.1. RCEP 참여국의 국제무역 매트릭스 분석
  4.2. RECP 참여국의 국제무역 매트릭스 분석
  4.3. RECP 참여국과 한국의 수출결합도
 5. 결론
  5.1. 연구결과 요약
  5.2. 연구의 시사점 및 한계점
 References

• Min-Soo Kim(Business Administration, Catholic Kwandong University. The Korea Chamber of Commerce & Industry, Korea.) | 김민수