Purpose - The purpose of this study is to classify that the quality factors for comparing the Visegrard Group with the Nordic Council have historical similarities against Germany and the Soviet Union. However, this is because in the integrated European market, the competitiveness possessed by the two groups of countries is invested in the priority order to grow.
Research design, data, and methodology – The study was conducted on the research design, and the reason for trying to compare the competence of the automobile industry in the assessment of industrial capability is that the Visegrard Group focuses on automotive production and the Nordic Association focuses on the commercialization of the automobile(market). In this study, searching and quantifying indirect evidence was made through standards are more complementary in Europe since each country acts like the role of the European automotive industry for example, which is different from the realistic evaluation criteria, are more important than those of the United States(first in the world) or Germany(first in Europe).
Results - The results of this study are as follows: In the global EV market U.S.(export: $ 2.62 billion /share: 36.7%), Germany($ 1.29 billion /18.1%), France($ 390 million /5.4%), United Kingdom($ 380 million /5.4%), and South Korea($ 320 million/ 4.4%). South Korea's share of the EV market is 4.4%, while TSI reaches at +0.9 which measures the comparative advantage of a specific commodity in the world trade market. There is great potential for evaluated as products processing in export competition. But, commercialization, standardization, and overall market expansion did not have a positive impact on global satisfaction.
Conclusions - EVs put importance on various utilities. So this suggests that Korea's exports to the EU, including the Visegrard Group, should be more focused on marketability when illuminating with a sharing industrial system under the European Union. It is necessary to specialize in manufacturing and commercialization by country(region) to prepare sharing economy and blockchain in order to create a smart-sharing city linked on artificial intelligence, as the commercialization of electric vehicles, which will have a larger growth rate than that of manufacturing in the fourth revolutionary era.

Abstract
 1. 서론
  1.1. 연구목적
  1.2. 이론적 배경
 3. 연구모델
  3.1. 비셰그라드 4그룹과 노르딕 협의회의 산업구조비교
  3.2. 연구모형(기술 지배력과 시장 지배력)
  3.3. 연구방법
  3.4. 전기자동차 산업 성장과 협력
  3.5. N5 노르딕(도시-전기차 융합시장)
 4. 연구결과
  4.1. 관계분석
  4.2. EVs(전기차) 경쟁과 스마트시티의 한국적인 관점
 5. 결론
  5.1. 요약과 시사점
  5.2. 한계
 References

• Dae-Sung Seo(Dept. of Padeia, Sungkyul University) | 서대성