Brain Perfusion CT는 시간적 제약을 많이 받는 허혈성 급성뇌경색 환자의 관류 상태에 대한 정보를 정확하고 신속하게 제공함으로써 적절한 치료를 하는데 유용한 촬영 기법으로 임상에서 많이 촬영되고 있다. 그러나 이런 장점에도 불구하고 수정체의 피폭선량이 아주 많다는 단점이 있다. 본 연구에서는 Brain Perfusion CT 검사 시 수정체 피폭선량을 최대한 감소시키기 위한 방법으로 Bismuth 차폐체와 Position의 변화를 통하여 수정체 피폭선량의 최소화 방안을 알아보기 위한 목적으로 본 실험을 진행하였다. 팬텀(PBU-50)을 사용하여 양쪽 수정체에 TLD(TLD-100)를 올려두고 IOML에 평행, IOML에 평행(Bismuth 차폐), SOML에 평행, SOML에 평행(Bismuth 차폐)의 총 4가지 Position으로 각각 5회씩 Brain Perfusion scan을 실시하여 수정체의 선량을 측정하였다. 그리고 각각의 Position에 따른 화질 변화를 측정하기 위해 4군데에 관심영역을 정하여 CT Number와 Noise의 변화를 측정하여 비교하였다. 측정된 선량을 일원배치 분산분석한 결과 유의확률 0.000으로 Position에 따라 수정체의 피폭선량에 차이가 있다고 나타났으며, Duncan 사후검정결과에서 IOML에 평행 scan을 기준으로 SOML에 평행 scan과 SOML에 평행 scan(Bismuth 차폐)에서 각각 89.16%, 89.66%로 수정체 선량이 많이 감소하였으며, IOML에 평행 scan(Bismuth 차폐) 에서 37.12%순으로 감소하여 나타났다. 연구 결과 피폭선량은 SOML에 평행한 scan과 Bismuth를 차폐하여 SOML에 평행한 scan이 동일하게 감쇠효과가 가장 크게 나타났다. 수정체의 등가선량 선량한도와 비교하여 IOML에 평행한 scan에서 종사자와 공중의 선량을 기준으로 비교하면 각각 39.47%, 394.73%로 나타났으나, Bismuth를 차폐하여 SOML에 평행한 scan에서 각각 4.08%, 40.8%로 현저하게 줄어 들었다. 화질평가에서 모든 영상의 CT Number와 Noise측정에서 팬텀 영상검사 평가기준에 적합하게 나타났다. Brain Perfusion CT 촬영 시 차폐체를 사용하고 수정체가 조사야에 들어오지 않도록 환자의 position을 조절하는 것이 수정체 피폭을 줄이는 가장 유용한 방법이라 사료된다.

Brain perfusion CT scanning is often employed usefully in clinical conditions as it accurately and promptly provides information about the perfusion state of patients having acute ischemic stroke with a lot of time constraints and allows them to receive proper treatment. Despite those strengths of it, it also has a serious weakness that Lens may be exposed to a lot of dose of radiation in it. In this study, as a way to reduce the dose of radiation to Lens in brain perfusion CT scanning, this researcher conducted an experiment with Bismuth shielding and change of patients’ position. TLD (TLD-100) was placed on both lens using the phantom (PBU-50), and then, in total 4 positions, parallel to IOML, parallel to IOML (Bismuth shielding), parallel to SOML, and parallel to SOML (Bismuth shielding), brain perfusion scanning was done 5 times for each position, and dose to Lens were measured. Also, to examine how the picture quality changed in different positions, 4 areas of interest were designated in 4 spots, and then, CT number and noise changes were measured and compared. According to the results of conducting one-way ANOVA on the doses measured, as the significance probability was found to be 0.000, so there was difference found in the doses of radiation to crystalline lenses. According to the results of Duncan’s post-hoc test, with the scanning of being parallel to IOML as the reference, the reduction of 89.16% and 89.66% was observed in the scanning of being parallel to SOML and that of being parallel to SOML (Bismuth shielding) respectively, so the doses to Lens reduced significantly. Next, in the scanning of being parallel to IOML (Bismuth shielding), the reduction of 37.12% was found. According to the results, reduction in the doses of radiation was found the most significantly both in the scanning of being parallel to SOML and that of being parallel to SOML (Bismuth shielding). With the limit of the equivalent dose to Lens as the reference, this researcher conducted comparison with the dose to occupational exposure and dose to Public exposure in the scanning of being parallel to IOML and found 39.47% and 394.73% respectively; however in the scanning of being parallel to SOML (Bismuth shielding), considerable reduction was found as 4.08% and 40.8% respectively. According to the results of evaluation on picture quality, every image was found to meet the evaluative standards of phantom scanning in terms of the measurement of CT numbers and noise. In conclusion, it would be the most useful way to reduce the dose of radiation to Lens to use shields in brain perfusion CT scanning and adjust patients’ position so that their lens will not be in the field of radiation.

ABSTRACT
 Ⅰ. INTRODUCTION
 Ⅱ. MATERIAL AND METHODS
  1. 측정 장비
  2. 측정 방법
  2. 영상 평가 방법
 Ⅲ. RESULT
  1. 수정체 선량
  2. Position에 따른 영상 평가
 Ⅳ. DISCUSSION
 Ⅴ. CONCLUSION
 Reference
 요 약

• Eun Bo Gang(동의과학대학교 방사선과) | 강은보 Corresponding Author