논문 상세보기

Perception of Radiological Technologists on Enacting of the Radiological Technologist Act in Korea KCI 등재

방사선사법의 제정을 위한 인식조사

  • 언어KOR
  • URLhttps://db.koreascholar.com/Article/Detail/347235
서비스가 종료되어 열람이 제한될 수 있습니다.
Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology (한국방사선학회논문지)
한국방사선학회 (The Korea Society of Radiology)
초록

이 논문에서는 방사선사법 제정에 반영해야하는 주요내용 및 방사선사법 필요성을 확인하기 위하여 방사선사의 인식 차이를 조사하였다. 방사선사법 제정에 대하여 방사선사를 대상으로 한 인식조사의 결과에서 “중요하다” 이상의 우선순위는 방사선사법 제정(90.1%), 방사선사 업무로 “조영제 주사” 법제화(85.8%), “의료방사선 정책 심의 위원회” 법제화(85.8%), “방사선사 윤리위원회”의 법제화(80.9%), 협회 방사선사 의무가입의 법제화(71.6%)이었다. “보통” 이상의 우선순위는 방사선사법 제정(100%), “의료방사선 정책 심의위원회” 법제화(97.1%), 방사선사 윤리위원회”의 법제화(95.1%), 방사선사 업무로 “조영제 주사” 법제화(95.1%), 인증평가제 도입 필요성(94.34)이었다. 필요성과 중요도에서 방사선사법은 최우선 과제로 여겨지고 개별 안건에 따라서 필요성과 중요도의 차이는 존재한다. 이는 방사선사법 제정의 논리적 근거와 정책방향을 결정하는 자료로 활용 가능할 것이다.

In this study, we investigated the differences in the perception of radiological technologists to identify the main contents to be reflected in the enacting of the radiological technologist act and the necessity of the radiological technologist act. In the results of perception surveys conducted on the subjects of radiological technologists about the enacting of the radiological technologist act, the priority over "Somewhat satisfied" is the enacting of the radiological technologist solo act (90.1%), and as for tasks of radiological technologists, there are legalization of contrast media injection (85.8%), legalization of medical radiation policy deliberative committee (85.8%), legalization of radiological technologist ethics committee (80.9%), legalization of Compulsory subscription (71.6%), etc. In the results of the perception survey for radiologists about the enactment of the radiological technologist act, the priority above "Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied" includes the enacting of the radiological technologist act (100%), legalization of medical radiation policy deliberative committee (97.1%), and legalization of radiological technologist ethics committee (95.1%), and as for the tasks of radiological technologists, there are legalization of "contrast media injection" (95.1%), and the necessity of Radiological Education and Evaluation (94.34), etc. The radiological technologist act is considered a top priority and there is a difference in importance according to the individual agenda. This can be used as a data to determine the logical basis and policy direction of the establishment of the radiological technologist act.

목차
ABSTRACT
 I. INTRODUCTION
 II. MATERIAL AND METHOD
 III. RESULTS
  1. 방사선사법 제정의 필요성
  2. 방사선사 양성 교육기관 인증평가제 도입 필요성
  3. 전문방사선사제도의 도입 필요성
  4. 방사선사 업무범위에 대한 인식
  5. 의료방사선정책심의위원회의 법제화
  6. 협회 의무가입의 법제화
  7. 방사선사 윤리위원회의 법제화
  8. 업무수행에 대한 의사와의 관계
  9. 결격사유의 강화
 IV. DISCUSSION & CONCLUSION
 Reference
 요 약
저자
  • Chang Seon Lim(Department of Radiological Science, Konyang University) | 임창선
  • Gye Hwan Jin(Department of Radiology, Nambu University) | 진계환 Corresponding Author