In the present study, we collected the information of the 18 major food safety incidents and conducted a delphi survey with 10 experts to analyze the effect of difference between terms used in reporting of the major food safety incidents on risk communication. In the result of the analysis of information from the major food safety incidents, discord of terms used from government, local government, media and consumer groups had a tremendous effect on the socioeconomic losses and caused the expansion of the incidents. The survey with 10 experts showed that there was a high correlation between the difference in ripple effect of reporting terms and the difference in reporting terms. A correlation coefficient was 0.865. Therefore, ripple effect of incidents was significantly affected by reporting terms and we concluded that standardization of term is necessary in reporting of the food safety incidents. These results can be used as a basic material for successful risk communication among the government, enterprises and consumers.

ABSTRACT
 연구내용 및 방법
  조사내용 및 분석방법
  조사대상 및 기간
 결과 및 고찰
  식품안전사건의 보도에 사용된 용어비교
  전문가 설문조사 결과분석
 요 약
 감사의 글
 참고문헌

• 오세라(중앙대학교 식품공학부, School of Food Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University) | Se-Ra Oh
• 신원정(중앙대학교 식품공학부, School of Food Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University) | Wonjung Shin
• 박태균(중앙일보, Joong-Ang Daily Newspaper, Seoul, Korea) | Tae-Gyun Park
• 김보영(한양대학교, School of Business, Hanyang University, Korea) | Renee Kim
• 김호식(한국과학기자협회, Korean Science Reporters Association, Seoul, Korea) | Ho-Sik Kim
• 이정호(식품의약품안전청 , Korea Food and Drug Administration, Osong, Korea) | Jeong-Ho Lee
• 황성휘(식품의약품안전청 , Korea Food and Drug Administration, Osong, Korea) | Seong-Hwi Hwang
• 하상도(중앙대학교 식품공학부, School of Food Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University) | Sang-Do Ha Correspondence to