Global rating agencies, such as Moody’s and S&P, have assigned credit ratings to corporate bonds issued by Japanese firms since 1980s. Local Japanese rating agencies, such as R&I and JCR, have more market share than the global raters. We examine the yield spreads of 1,050 yen-denominated corporate bonds issued by financial firms in Japan from 1998 to 2014 and find no evidence that bonds rated by at least one global agency are associated with a significant reduction in the cost of debt as compared to those rated by only local rating agencies. Unlike non-financial firms, the reputation effect of global rating agencies does not exist for Japanese financial firms. We also observe that firms with less information asymmetry are more likely to acquire ratings from Moody’s or S&P. Additionally, the firm’s financial profile does not affect its choice to seek out ratings from global raters. Our findings are contradictory to those by Han, Pagano, and Shin (2012), who employ bonds issued by non-financial firms in Japan. Our conjecture is that the asymmetric nature of financial firms makes investors less likely to depend on a credit risk assessment by rating agencies in determining the yields of new bonds.

Abstract
 1. Introduction
 2. Literature Review
 3. Hypotheses and Research Methods
 4. Data and Descriptive Statistics
 5. Empirical Results
 6. Robustness Checks
 7. Conclusion
 References

• Seung Hun Han(School of Business and Technology Management, College of Business)
• Walter J. Reinhart(Department of Finance, The Sellinger School of Business and Management, Loyola University)
• Yoon S. Shin(Department of Finance, The Sellinger School of Business and Management, Loyola University) Corresponding Author