논문 상세보기

도시자연공원과 근린공원에 대한 중요도 요소 평가의 비교 KCI 등재

An Comparison to the Importance Evaluation of an Urban Natural Parks and Neighborhood Parks

  • 언어KOR
  • URLhttps://db.koreascholar.com/Article/Detail/360084
서비스가 종료되어 열람이 제한될 수 있습니다.
한국환경과학회지 (Journal of Environmental Science International)
한국환경과학회 (The Korean Environmental Sciences Society)
초록

This study aims to examine what factors park users value in urban parks and to find ways to elevate user satisfaction for the creation and usage of an urban park. To achieve this, the study relied on two methods: the descriptive method of researching publications and related scholastic writings, and the empirical study method including a survey of present condition and interviews with users. The result shows that the "sense of nature" is more important than “functional facilities” in urban natural parks and "management part like safety and cleanliness of park" is more important than "utilizing facilities" in urban neighborhood parks. Generally, the importance rating of urban parks visitors felt in them were higher than the satisfaction rating, in terms of living surroundings. Factor analysis resulted in six factors in a natural park and in eight factors in a neighborhood park. Regression analysis in a natural and a neighborhood park showed a positively correlated factor: benefits sought, suggesting that people recognize the importance of urban parks through the benefits they gain in them and the satisfaction they find in urban parks depends on utilizing facilities. Therefore, in urban natural parks, people will find greater satisfaction through pursuit of the benefits they are seeking; improvements to park facilities should address the benefits that park users are seeking.

저자
  • 심준영(성균관대학교 조경학과) | Joon Young Shim
  • 이종성(상명대학교 산업과학 연구소) | Jong Sung Lee
  • 이시영(배재대학교 조경디자인학과) | Shi Young Lee Corresponding Author