Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is an important policy implemented before starting development projects to estimate and reduce environmental impact. However, the difficulty of quantification on several rating categories has hampered comprehensive analysis. Instead of it, the current EIA just summarizes outcome of investigation. Therefore, EIA fails to definitively ascertain whether the development shold be approved or not. This study aimed at providing the way to comprehensive decision-making by applying Emergy analysis and Emergy indicators to EIA. Production (P), Emergy Yield Ratio (EYR), Environmental Loading Ratio (ELR) and Emergy Sustainability Index (ESI) were selected for indicators. The indicators of range approving the development were set up with comparing before and after development or according to circumstances of which view of average that was classified as region or industry is appropriate to analysis. As a result, the value after development of P should be higher than the value before development. EYR and ESI of the value before development should be higher than region or industry average. On the contrary to these, ELR of the value after development should be lower than region or industry average. To verify applying Emergy indicators to EIA comprehensive analysis, Emergy evaluation was conducted to real case. As a result, applying Emergy analysis could suggest whether the development is appropriate or not. These indices and the result of this research are expected to be applied decision-making on environmental impact for sustainable development.

Abstract
 1. 서 론
 2. 방 법
  2.1. 지표의 선정
  2.2. 지표의 범위 설정
 3. 결과 및 고찰
  3.1. 환경영향평가 대상사업의 분류
  3.2. 지표의 범위 및 의사결정 절차
  3.3. Emergy 지표의 적용
 4. 결 론
 REFERENCES

• 강서희(부경대학교 생태공학과) | Seo Hee Kang (Department of Ecological Engineering, Pukyong National University)
• 이석모(부경대학교 생태공학과) | Suk Mo Lee (Department of Ecological Engineering, Pukyong National University) Corresponding author