The purpose of the present study was to compare the long-term management objectives, policy objectives, implementation plans, and detailed plans of four provincial parks established in 2013 using various analysis frameworks. Through this, the study aimed to identify the characteristics of the management plan and extract the implementation plan important to each park by analyzing the priorities in the detailed plan. The long-term management objectives of most parks were to maintain recreational functions by utilizing all the resources of the park, rather than merely preserving the ecosystem. From an ecological perspective, information on major plants and legal protection species are included for most parks, and geological and topographic features considered a major resource. For sustainable forests, it is important to induce the dispersion of concentrated use space. Efficient management systems are distinctively differentiated among the parks. For regional revitalization, the management of programs to link provincial parks and their surrounding areas has become most important. From an ecological perspective, priorities differed for the parks according to their ecological characteristics. For sustainable forests, Moaksan Provincial Park prioritized the visitor reservation system related to the overall park, while the other three parks prioritized alleviating the concentrated use of specific areas. From an efficient management perspective, Daedunsan Provincial Park prioritized aspects related to the cableway. Maisan Provincial Park prioritized inducing the linkage between the use of natural and cultural resources, and Seonunsan Provincial Park prioritized establishing an ecological and cultural commentary operating system. For the base-type leisure activity space, Moaksan Provincial Park prioritized the systematic management and operation of the pilgrimage route, Maisan Provincial Park the connection between the Maisan geography and residents’ income, and Seonunsan Provincial Park providing a space for ecological education.

ABSTRACT
 1. Introduction
 2. Literature Reviews
 3. Methods
  3.1 Subjects
  3.2 Methodology
 4. Results and Discussions
  4.1 Comparison of the Long-term ManagementObjectives
  4.2 Comparative Analysis of ImplementationPlans According to Policy Objectives
  4.3 Analysis of Implementation Plan Priorities
 5. Conclusions
 References

• Nara Jeong(Urban Agriculture Division, National Institute of Horticultural & Herbal Science, RDA)
• Sanghui Kang(Institute of Recreation and Landscape Planning, Chonbuk National Universty) Corresponding author
• Deugsoo Ahn(Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Chonbuk National University)