Offshore trap fishery managers have payed in advance to attract excellent fishing crew in the minium grantee lay system. This practice can intensify competition among fishery management bodies and increase the burden of fishery manager about income tax and four social insurance programs. The purpose of this study is to identify the problems of advance payment practice in terms of fishery manager in offshore trap fishery. The main results of this study are as follows. First, under the TYPE 1 model, which is the current wage payment manner, there is a risk that fishery manager will not able to return the prepayment paid in advance when the income of fishery management bodies decrease. Second, the TYPE 2 or the TYPE 3 model which reduces or abolishes advance payment can alleviate the burden of fishery manager relative to the deduction of redemption amount, incentive to induce artificial expenses, income tax and four social insurance programs. In conclusion, advance payment practice in offshore trap fishery is placing a heavy burden on the fishery manager. In order to solve these problems in the future, we need to find solutions through similar case studies.

Abstract
 I. 서 론
 Ⅱ. 근해통발어업의 수익 및 공동경비 구조
  1. 근해통발어업의 수익 구조
  2. 근해통발어업의 공동경비 구조
 Ⅲ. 타 근해어업과의 임금지급방식 비교분석
 Ⅳ. 연구설계
  1. 연구를 위한 기본전제
  2. 연구모형
  3. 짓가림제 하에서 소득 분배 방법
 Ⅴ. 연구결과
  1. TYPE 1 모형에서 어선원 임금
  2. TYPE 2 모형에서 어선원 임금
  3. TYPE 3 모형에서 어선원 임금
 Ⅵ. 요약 및 결론
 REFERENCES

• 문성주(국립경상대학교 해양과학대학 수산경영학과) | Seong-Ju Moon (Department of Fisheries Business Administration, Institute of Marine Industry, College of Marine Science, Gyeongsang National University)
• 김우수(국립경상대학교 해양과학대학 수산경영학과) | Woo-Soo Kim (Department of Fisheries Business Administration, Institute of Marine Industry, College of Marine Science, Gyeongsang National University) Corresponding author
• 강종호(국립경상대학교 해양과학대학 수산경영학과) | Jong-Ho Kang (Department of Fisheries Business Administration, Institute of Marine Industry, College of Marine Science, Gyeongsang National University)