In March 2014 the Myanmar Hluttaw, or Parliament, enacted the Myanmar National Human Rights Commission Law, which provided a statutory basis for a national human rights body in Myanmar. The Myanmar government declared to the United Nations Human Rights Council that the Enabling Law was compliant with the United Nations Paris Principles that set international standards for national human rights institutions. Despite the claims of the Myanmar government, however, critics charge the Enabling Law is insufficient, with detractors claiming the law leaves the MNHRC with anaemic powers incapable of advancing human rights. This paper responds to such issues by conducting an independent evaluation of the MNHRC Enabling Law under the Paris Principles. In doing so, the analysis treats the Enabling Law as a case study demonstrating how the Paris Principles can be exercised by third parties as the UN-supported international standards for national human rights institutions.

1. Introduction
 2. Evaluation under the Paris Principles
  A. Criterion 1: A mandate
  B. Criterion 2: Adequate resources to fulfil its mandate
  C. Criterion 3: Powers adequate to fulfil the mandate
  D. Criterion 4: Autonomy and independence from government
  E. Criterion 5: A pluralist composition
 3. Overall Status under the Paris Principles
 4. Accreditation under the Paris Principles
 5. Conclusion

• Jonathan Liljeblad(Senior Lecturer at Swinburne University of Technology Law School.)