This study is to excavate superior fishing communities by applying the Ostrom (1990)’s principles of sustainable and successful use of common goods. Ostrom(1990)’s principles are (1) clearly defined boundaries (2) congruence between appropriation and provision rules and local conditions, (3) collective choice arrangements (4) monitoring (5) graduated sanctions (6) conflict-resolution mechanism (7) recognition of rights to organize by external government authorities (8) nested enterprises. The survey was carried out under the individual interview method of 15 fishing village members in 32 fishing communities with the government’s fishery environment improvement and fishery creation projects. The total effective samples are 477. These data were analyzed. The analysis result shows that 24 fishing villages are selected among the 32 fishing communities in the samples, including Nanji, Sanghwang, Songseok, Sinshido, Jukyo, Jinsan, Changli, Pado, Beopsan, Rahyang, Palbong, Woongdo, Daehwang, Sapsi, Chido, Jinri, Daeri, Songgak, Joongwang, Ojii, Doripo, Doseong, Mongsan 1ri and Songnim as superior fishing villages. The results of this study have limitation that may vary depending on the rigor of the criteria in the process of deriving good fishing communities. Despite this limitation, this study has expanded existing research focused on validating the theoretical applicability of the framework through case analysis of specific fishing communities to objectively and quantitatively to many fishing communities. The results of this study are expected to contribute to the creation of conditions in which fishermen can continue to manage their fishing grounds and stand on their own feet by presenting the framework and principles for developing desirable fishing village models for the continued use of mudflat shells grounds as the common goods.

Abstract
 Ⅰ. 서 론
 Ⅱ. 표본 및 연구 설계
  1. 표본 대상
  2. 설문의 설계
 Ⅲ. 설문 분석
  1. 명확하게 정의된 경계
  2. 이용공급규칙과 현지조건의 부합성
  3. 집합적 선택장치
  4. 감시활동
  5. 점증적 제재조치
  6. 갈등해결 장치
  7. 최소한의 자치 조직권 보장
 Ⅳ. 우수 어촌계 선정 결과
  1. 명확하게 정의된 경계
  2. 이용공급규칙과 현지조건의 부합성
  3. 집합적 선택장치
  4. 감시활동
  5. 갈등해결 장치
  6. 최소한의 자치 조직권 보장
  7. 중층의 정합적인 사업단위 조직
  8. 최종 우수 어촌계 발굴
 Ⅴ. 요약 및 결론
 REFERENCES

• 강석규(제주대학교 경영학과) | Seok-Kyu Kang (Department of Business Administration, Jeju National University) Corresponding author