President Trump has, for the first time in the US trade history, aggressively redefined the US trade policy as a supporting actor in the US national security policy. His presidential actions have involved a broad array of legislation, such as trade sanctions and export controls. Most astonishing is that President Trump has imposed trade restrictions by relying upon unilateral findings of national security risks or the existence of national emergencies. We are now at a point where federal courts in the US have been asked to review the validity of presidential trade actions, specifically the central legality of the broad delegation of congressional trade authority over the last 75 years. I predict that the federal courts will uphold the separation of powers in the face of the outrageous and unprecedented onslaught of presidential tariff and trade actions by a president relying upon dubious claims of national security and national emergency.

1. President Trump’s Aggressive Trade Actions
2. Federal Litigation and President Trump’s Trade Actions
3. Reviving Separation of Powers and the New Federalism
4. WTO Litigation and the US
5. Prediction
References

• Stuart S. Malawer(Distinguished Service Professor of Law and International Trade at George Mason’s University’s Schar School of Policy and Government. J.D. (Cornell))