논문 상세보기

Is China’s Belt and Road Initiative Moving towards a Silk Road Union?: A Legal and Policy Consideration KCI 등재 SCOPUS

  • 언어ENG
  • URLhttps://db.koreascholar.com/Article/Detail/388356
구독 기관 인증 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다. 7,800원
이준국제법연구원 (YIJUN Institute of International Law)
초록

In order to facilitate its Belt and Road Initiative, China has issued dozens of policy documents and detailed guidelines, improved its legal and supervisory systems, and taken full advantage of all existing cooperation mechanisms at the bilateral, regional, sub-regional and multilateral levels. The current cooperation mechanism is characterized by non-systemicity, which makes it dependent upon other existing regional cooperation mechanisms. In fact, it has no uniform institutional structure, nor any dispute settlement mechanism. Although this non-systematic approach is based in China’s successful experience in opening up to outside influence and in the flexibility that enabled its rise to global prominence, this very flexibility also poses challenges to the implementation of the Belt and Road Initiative by leaving it open to conflict with existing regional cooperation mechanisms. Therefore, to ensure the success of the Belt and Road Initiative, China should undertake a systematic plan for implementation by establishing a comprehensive legal framework; streamlining paths to economic cooperation; and institutionalizing the cooperation mechanism with a formal dispute settlement mechanism at its core.

목차
I. Introduction
II. China’s Belt and Road Initiative:A Unified Constitutional Framework?
    A. China’s Policy Documents on the BRI
    B. China’s Legal and Administrative Measures on the BRI
    C. International Cooperation Agreements on the BRI
III. Characteristics and Challenges ofthe BRI Cooperation Mechanism
    A. Openness and Inclusiveness
    B. Complex Laws and Policies
    C. Non-systemicity
IV. An Alternative to a Silk Road Union
    A. Systematic Construction of the BR Cooperation Mechanism
    B. Economic Cooperation as the Greatest Common Denominator
    C. The Urgent Need for a Dispute Settlement Mechanism
V. Conclusion
References
저자
  • Ran Guo(International Law at Shanghai Maritime University)