The implementation of PPK-BLU in Indonesia was not followed by a comprehensive change in aspects of organization, human resources, and finance. Based on this background, this study aims to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the BTIP after the implementation of the PPK-BLU policy in the implementation of telecommunications services and information to the public in Indonesia. This research used integration of the McKinsey 7S method, Analytical Hierarchy Process, and Likert scale. The integration of these methods can provide a detailed quantitative analysis. Based on the overall evaluation results of carrying out the PPK BLU, BTIP has a performance value of 81.195%, which puts it within the Good category. The McKinsey 7S elements used as a whole have the following values: one aspect is categorized as Very Good, namely, the strategy aspect with a value of 91.025%; two aspects are categorized as Good (structural aspects with a value of 86.857%, and skill aspects with a value of 81.432%); three aspects are categorized as Adequate (style aspect with a value of 76.441%, staff aspect with a value of 78.605%, and share value aspect with a value of 76.331%); one aspect is categorized as Bad, that is the system aspect with a value of 67.503%.

Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Material/Methods
    2.1. BTIP
    2.2. Financial Management Pattern of PublicService Agency (PPK-BLU)
    2.3. Evaluation
    2.4. Policy
    2.5. McKinsey 7S
    2.6. Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)
    2.7. Research Subjects and Research Objects
    2.8. Research Objectives and Stages
    2.9. Flowchart
3. Results and Discussion
    3.1. Identification and Criteria Weighting
    3.2 Performance Evaluation of BTIP Performancebased on McKinsey 7S
4. Conclusion
5. Future Work
References

• Vera YUWANTARI(Brawijaya University) Corresponding Author
• S. SUMARTONO(Brawijaya University)
• Choirul SALEH(Brawijaya University)
• Bambang SANTOSO(Brawijaya University)