논문 상세보기

Fiscal Decentralization, Corruption, and Income Inequality: Evidence from Vietnam KCI 등재 SCOPUS

  • 언어ENG
  • URLhttps://db.koreascholar.com/Article/Detail/400993
서비스가 종료되어 열람이 제한될 수 있습니다.
한국유통과학회 (Korea Distribution Science Association)
초록

The objective of this research paper is to study the simultaneous relationship between fiscal decentralization, corruption, and income inequality among Vietnamese provinces. We use a balanced panel data set of 63 provinces/cities in Vietnam in the period from 2011 to 2018. The study used 3SLS-GMM (Three Stage Least Squares - Generalized Method of Moments estimator) and GMM-HAC (Generalized Method of Moments - Heteroskedastic and Autocorrelation Consistent estimator). Empirical evidence shows a strong simultaneous relationship: increased corruption will increase regional income disparities, income inequality, and increase fiscal decentralization. In addition, the results also suggest that an increase in per-capita income will reduce the level of corruption, or better control corruption of each province. The degree of increase in income inequality, which reduces fiscal decentralization, is the same for trade liberalization. All demonstrate that there is a simultaneous relationship between fiscal decentralization, corruption, and income inequality. In a region of high public governance quality, fiscal decentralization positively effects its economic growth. This issue will indirectly increase income inequality between provinces within a country. Our findings imply that a country’s fiscal decentralization strategy should be linked to improving corruption control and local governance effectiveness, indirectly improving income inequality between localities or regions.

목차
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
    2.1. Fiscal Decentralization and IncomeInequalities
    2.2. Income Inequality and Corruption
    2.3. Fiscal Decentralization and Corruption
3. Data Description
4. Models and Estimation Methods
    4.1. Research Model
    4.2. Method of Estimation
5. Results, Conclusions and Implications
    5.1. Research Results
    5.2. Conclusions
    5.3. Policy Implications
References
저자
  • Hung Thanh NGUYEN(School of Public Finance, University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam)
  • Thuy Hoang Ngoc VO(Thu Dau Mot University, Thu Dau Mot City, Binh Duong Province, Vietnam)
  • Duc Doan Minh LE(School of Accounting, University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam) Corresponding Author
  • Vu Thanh NGUYEN(Nguyen Tat Thanh University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam)