This study examines whether the adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) has increased financial statement comparability among firms and reduced undervaluation of Korean firms in the capital market by enhancing financial statement comparability. The so-called Korea Discount, which indicates an inefficient allocation of capital, has been attributed to lack of transparency and comparability of accounting information. Therefore, an efficient distribution of capital in the market was intended when IFRS was first adopted in Korea, but such progress is based on a premise of enhancement in Korean firms’ accounting information comparability. This study conducts empirical analysis by using a comparability measure by De Franco et al. (2011). More specifically, it analyzes differences among comparability of domestic firms following IFRS adoption, with firms in the EU, which adopted IFRS in 2005, and with firms in the U.S., China and Japan that do not follow IFRS. The analysis of changes in domestic firms’ comparability finds that their comparability improved following IFRS adoption. Meanwhile, the examination of cross-national differences in comparability demonstrates that, although there has been no significant change in comparability with firms in the U.S. and the EU across Korean industry since IFRS adoption, comparability with China has decreased while that with Japan improved.

Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
3. Research Methods
    3.1. Research Model and Variable Measurement
    3.2. Sample Selection
4. Results
5. Conclusion
References

• Do Jin JUNG(Accounting Department, College of Business and Economics, Chung-Ang University, Republic of Korea.)
• Ji An HUR(Accounting Department, College of Business and Economics, Chung-Ang University, Republic of Korea) Corresponding Author
• A Reum JUNG(Center for Social Value Enhancement Studies, Republic of Korea.)